User talk:TantLem

Ways to improve Pavlos Savvidis

Hello, TantLem,

Thank you for creating Pavlos Savvidis.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

He needs major awards such as an APS Fellow for notability. If you cannot find this type of major peer recognition then he should not have a page, sorry. The bar is quite high.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:07, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hi TantLem. Thank you for your work on Pavlos Savvidis. Another editor, Ldm1954, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Very marginal for notability as he has no significant awards to butress a fair but not outstanding publication record.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Ldm1954}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Ldm1954 (talk) 19:08, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pavlos Savvidis for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pavlos Savvidis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pavlos Savvidis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ldm1954 (talk) 17:01, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:TheCaseOfGoliath per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/TheCaseOfGoliath. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Spicy (talk) 17:30, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]