User talk:Tanscan27
This user is a student editor in College_of_DuPage/English_1102_NET_48_(Spring_2021) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tanscan27, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 03:05, 8 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]Hi there. I'm Serge, an Admin here on Wikipedia. I just wanted to clear up some misconceptions. You may want to read WP:GAMECRUFT. Wikipedia write overviews of video games, but we don't write "Game Guides" or "How to play the game" type stuff. So massive lists of in-game stuff, like characters, are generally not appropriate. That's really more the type of stuff you would write (and no doubt already see) on fan wikis and wikia type websites. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 14:31, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- I apologize that they didn't explain a little more, but alas, this sort of thing happens a lot with new editors, explanations often grow briefer and briefer over time due to the repetition involved. Anyways, I'm not really sure character info is really headed anywhere for you in this article. The extent they need to be mentioned is already established in the article - mentioning things like the role of Tom Nook or Isabelle in the gameplay mechanics. Story sections generally have mentions of characters too, but with Animal Crossing not really having any narrative outside of what's already outlined, there's really nowhere to go there either. If you're dead set on writing about Animal Crossing, the Reception section is tagged for needing expansion, and I can verify that this is necessary. What's currently in the section is fine, we just need more of it. So you could check out WP:VG/S for a list of acceptable websites to use, and try to mirror what's being done there with new sources. Sergecross73 msg me 17:41, 23 April 2021 (UTC)
- I wouldn't worry about the passing comment about WP:VANDALISM either. An editor simply mused that because they observed some errors in your edits as well. It was just their personal take on the matter. Their comment isn't enough to get you into any sort of trouble, and I'm sure if they saw your comments here they'd probably take back what they said anyways. Sergecross73 msg me 17:48, 23 April 2021 (UTC)