User talk:Tannerslaught
Nomination of Ariane Bellamar for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ariane Bellamar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ariane Bellamar until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 07:47, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Tannerslaught (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I do not understand why my account has been blocked. I work in small office and have been discussing my recent activity with the ArianeBellamar article page with my co-workers and how frustrated I am with people jumping to conclusions without absorbing all of the information. After a 'rant', as I must admittedly say it was, I few people I work with in the office said they created an account and wanted to support my cause. Personally, I believe this type of behaviour should be rewarded as it has sparked new users to join the Wikipedia cause - just as it once inspired me to try writing a page about someone I admire from television. I would respectfully ask the admin to take a deeper look into this block and release my account based on my trustworthy contributions and my reliable debates. I believe I am adding to the Wikipedia quest for knowledge and silencing people who have worked to further the cause is destructive and is a manipulative action taken by my opposing side to silence me because I will win this debate based on cold hard facts.
Decline reason:
I looked at the technical data and I agree with the block. Also, the technical data doesn't match the story you've provided. Mike V • Talk 21:05, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tannerslaught (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How can this be true when no one has had access to my computer and I have not been on anyone else's computer? This experience has only proven the flawed system Wiki has developed, because if an Admin cannot see the difference between what I have written and what someone else has written then you really cannot see much. For if you really could see specific data you would see that I am located on a main commercial strip in Los Angeles and the MAC address on my account is not connected to any other user on Wikipedia. If Wiki is going to take actions like this against me then I do not want the work I have painstaking put together to be on a site like this. I request that all of my contributions to Wikipedia be removed as I will not contribute to such a flawed and corrupt system.Tan (talk) 21:28, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Not an actual unblock request as the user has expressed desire to never return to Wikipedia so no reason to unblock. only (talk) 21:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tannerslaught (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am requesting further investigation to my 'sockpuppeting" because I have not created multiple accounts. If an admin can please check my MAC address you should be able to see that I have not used my account, not now or ever, for multiple accounts. This is the only Wiki account I have ever created and the only one that has ever been used on this computer. Please look deeper into the accusations to determine that innocent of the charges placed on my account. Thank you. Tan (talk) 23:24, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have already been checkusered twice, with the same result. We cannot check MAC, only your IP address. Max Semenik (talk) 02:39, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tannerslaught (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have only been checked once as the second time and the third time has not resulted in any investigation into the claims held against me only referencing the first investigation. Is there anyone who can check the specific internet settings to clear my name. I have not created multiple accounts and this seems ridiculous to me that I am being held hostage to my silence for something I didn't do. What can I do to prove that I am not guilty of these charges? Tan (talk) 05:56, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Given your "co-workers" explanation coupled with solid checkuser results, there's no reason to pursue this further. Talk page access revoked for WP:IDIDNTHEARTHAT. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Max Semenik is not entirely correct - CU includes other personally-identifying info which CUs will not openly discuss - but he is correct that device MAC addresses are not among the things a CU can see. CUs also cannot determine your Internet settings (assuming you mean what I think you mean) from a check; this would be tantamount to cracking as that information is for the most part stored on the local machine/network, and what little is shown of your setup from that is among the things CU can see. —Jeremy v^_^v Bori! 10:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Please note that Jeremy is neither a checkuser nor an admin. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)