User talk:Tanire2009

Welcome!

Hello, Tanire2009, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Questions page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! EvergreenFir (talk) 04:35, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary Sanction Notification

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

EvergreenFir (talk) 04:36, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

July 2020

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at User talk:EvergreenFir, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Binksternet (talk) 19:17, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm RegentsPark. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:EvergreenFir that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. regentspark (comment) 19:19, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for treating Wikipedia as a battleground and personal attacks.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:24, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tanire2009 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here see below

Decline reason:

You are blocked for engaging in personal attacks and for treating Wikipedia like a battleground. I took a look through your edits. You have indeed done these things. "Good job on the propaganda", etc. I am glad you hold the First Amendment and the Second Amendment and the Bill of Rights as important and meaningful. I agree that the Bill of Rights is not itself alt-right. But none of that is relevant. You are blocked for WP:NPA and WP:BATTLEGROUND. You aren't blocked for your beliefs but for your actions. Yamla (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I tried to have a discussion to say that the boog movement is not far right, as biased propagandists have labeled it on wikipedia. They simply closed the discussion before I could even make a second comment. I am an expert on the movement, and a member of over 10 pages and groups on multiple platforms. We are not far right. We are pro freedom, pro first amendment, pro second amendment, and anti-oppression/tyranny. It is sad that wikipedia got taken over by biased left wing people who can change any group they don’t like to alt-right or far-right and then lock the page.

Evergreenfir and one other guy literally attacked me and then closed the conversation. Then when i opened a talk to call that biased, this happened. Tanire2009 (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Leftist biased propagandists labeling the boogaloo movement far rights BS.

I tried to have a discussion to say that the boog movement is not far right, as biased propagandists have labeled it on wikipedia. They simply closed the discussion before I could even make a second comment. I am an expert on the movement, and a member of over 10 pages and groups on multiple platforms. We are not far right. We are pro freedom, pro first amendment, pro second amendment, and anti-oppression/tyranny. It is sad that wikipedia got taken over by biased left wing people who can change any group they don’t like to alt-right or far-right and then lock the page. Tanire2009 (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Some things you'll need to show you understand if you want to be unblocked

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. All we do here is cite, summarize, and paraphrase professionally-published mainstream academic or journalistic sources, without addition, nor commentary.
We do not publish original thought nor original research. We're not a blog, we're not here to promote any ideology. -- As a member of the movement, you are here to promote their ideology, even if you don't consciously realize that.
"Truth" is not the only criteria for inclusion, verifiability is also required. -- I wrote this originally do deal with users who wanted to put their religious faith in the articles.
Reliable sources typically include: articles from mainstream magazines or newspapers (particularly scholarly journals), or books by recognized authors (basically, books by respected publishers). Online versions of these are usually accepted, provided they're held to the same standards. User generated sources (like Wikipedia) are to be avoided. Self-published sources should be avoided except for information by and about the subject that is not self-serving (for example, citing a company's website to establish something like year of establishment).
Articles are to be written from a neutral point of view. Wikipedia is not concerned with facts or opinions, it just summarizes reliable sources. Real scholarship actually does not say what understanding of the world is "true," but only with what there is evidence for. We do not give equal validity to topics which reject and are rejected by mainstream academia. For example, our article on Earth does not pretend it is flat, hollow, and/or the center of the universe.
Users should never make personal attacks on others. It's a good idea to avoid commenting on people, but on content, and then if necessary, actions.
Assume as best as you can that other editors are here to help.

You'll need to understand and operate by these concepts if you want to be unblocked and if you want to edit the Boogaloo movement article. (And I don't just mean saying "I understand," you'll have to explain how these policies and guidelines reflect upon your behavior so far and how you'll improve). If you continue to just keep pushing that you're right and everyone else is wrong, you have no place in any cooperative project. Ian.thomson (talk) 21:28, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah I get it. I am a part of the boog movement and thousands of people in the movement are upset that wiki liberals are labeling the movement far right. I am here to correct that lie. And lots of people in the talk page are saying that we are not alt right, but they are ignored and the conversations are closed by biased people. Tanire2009 (talk) 23:01, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

People who don’t live in igloos shouldn’t throw stones at eskimos. Tanire2009 (talk) 23:03, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

On this one exact topic, labeling of the big fiesta as alt right, everyone calling it alt right is making shit up or repeating shit that is made up. It’s disgusting. Tanire2009 (talk) 23:04, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]