User talk:Tancrede

Cathedral

Unfortunately I have had to remove the lovely pic of Notre Dame. If you have a computer screen that is squarish, rather than widish, it looks as if there is more room for additional pics. However, on a wide screen the pics go right down to the bottom of the article, and the pic of Pisa lines up somewhere below the paragraph on tourism.

The problem with fixing a pic to the text, as you did with Notre Dame, rather than having them float down the side, as they do, is that everything below the pic gets orphaned from the heading immediately above the pic. So, for example, if there is a heading saying Tourism, then the entire text relating to that heading appears about 3 inches further down the page. The great gap in the text is quite unacceptable. This problem shows up to its absolute worst when people jam large boxes in, above pics.

You might also notice that (with the exception of the bishop's throne which is the only available) every other picture is of matching landscape format. This is to fit as many as possible, and also to maintain a sort of scale and similarity, since they are all very close together. It's about layout, and there are heaps of pics to choose from. But not all subject eg Cathedral Choirs, are well represented on Commons. I might have a bit of a fiddle with the pics nd try a different layout.

Amandajm (talk) 07:41, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

excessive lists

please read WP:NOTDIR we don't list most or many artists. Louvre is more what this article should look like. LibStar (talk) 00:01, 3 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of Scorpions

The article 20th Century Masters: The Millennium Collection: The Best of Scorpions has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No sources besides Allmusic. Album didn't chart.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 20:09, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Hôtel particulier, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palais Rohan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:09, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited France, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Museum of Fine Arts (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]