User talk:EditingGuy564738

Concern regarding Draft:Kohtee Aramboy

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kohtee Aramboy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Pakping moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Pakping, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 16:23, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

When copying within Wikipedia, please add attribution in your first edit summary (not in the article itself). Also, please be sure to copy over the details of the source books. Please see Diff of Battle of Kamphaeng Phet for the corrections I made. Please let me know if you have any questions, or have a look at WP:Copying within Wikipedia for more information. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 12:31, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Also, stub tags go at the bottom of pages. I've already fixed these in your other articles, as well as the attribution notices, but please do check and fix the book sources, as Diannaa has mentioned. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:22, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Battle of Goteik Gorge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mongolian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kohtee Aramboy

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kohtee Aramboy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 09:35, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Battle of Pakping (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle of Pakping and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Battle of Pakping, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:14, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Creating/splitting content into new articles

Hi. Some of your recent contributions still have the issues raised in the #Copying within Wikipedia section above. Please remember to include full references, make attribution notices in the edit summary or on the talk page, and place stub tags at the bottom of pages.

A separate issue I'd like to note is whether it's necessary or beneficial to split content into sub-articles as you have been doing. While creating sub-articles per the WP:Summary style is useful for very large articles, some of the battle articles you've been creating are very short and seem fine as sections in the main article, as they previously were. I think it's a better idea to only create separate articles when there's a lot of content that you plan to add that would be too much for main article. Please consider this; thanks. --Paul_012 (talk) 11:47, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'd appreciate if you provided some acknowledgement of these messages. As Wikipedia is a collaborative project, WP:communication is required. --Paul_012 (talk) 18:13, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Kaleinaung moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Kaleinaung, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:49, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Pho Sam Ton moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Battle of Pho Sam Ton, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:37, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Taksin's Reunification of Siam moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Taksin's Reunification of Siam, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Note: the reason in particular is that there are references to two print sources cited, but there is no bibliography or specific references to the texts in question, making it impossible to verify the article's citations. Feel free to submit for approval once that is corrected. A S U K I T E 11:01, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Taksin's Reunification of Siam has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Taksin's Reunification of Siam. Thanks! A S U K I T E 11:28, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775)

The article Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unneeded content fork of other Wikipedia articles, of a subject that does not exist. Article describes no such thing as a "Burmese-Siamese war".

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Paul_012 (talk) 14:34, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Taksin into Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:11, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Paul_012 (talk) 08:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of wars involving Thailand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chiang Saen.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:03, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How many times will you need reminding of attribution requirements and proper referencing?

บทความ Siamese–Vietnamese War (1769–1773) คุณลืมให้เครดิตที่มา และไม่ได้คัดลอกบรรณานุกรมอีกแล้วนะครับ ไม่ทราบว่าจะต้องให้เตือนกันอีกกี่รอบ --Paul_012 (talk) 19:42, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775)" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 5#Burmese–Siamese War (1767–1775) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Paul_012 (talk) 13:36, 5 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ayutthaya Kingdom map?

Hi, why did you change the map for the Ayutthaya Kingdom article? Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 19:44, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update: I reverted the image back to the original one but if you can manage to emphasize the kingdom (highlighting it, etc...) within the image, I might be okay for that to be an infobox image. Don't forget to center the Ayutthaya Kingdom in the image if you happen to redo the map. Thanks in advance. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 00:32, 27 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Phraya Phichai, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Phichai.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sep 21

Please read wp:minor.Slatersteven (talk) 11:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia (4th request)

It appears that you copied or moved text from Taksin into Taksin's reunification of Siam. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. DanCherek (talk) 12:32, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So far, you have never responded to any of these requests and warnings. Please provide some form of acknowledgement to show that you have read these messages. As previously mentioned, Wikipedia is a collaborative project and communication is required. Failure to communicate might necessitate further disciplinary measures.

ขอความกรุณาตอบกลับเพื่อแสดงให้เห็นว่าคุณได้อ่านข้อความเหล่านี้และรับรู้ถึงปัญหาด้วยนะครับ --Paul_012 (talk) 20:26, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your attempt at providing attribution was still incorrect. Do not insert it in the content of the article as you did in this edit. What you should do is put it in the edit summary. That is the box shown in the example picture. --Paul_012 (talk) 00:22, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:58, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Burmese–Siamese War (1759–60)

Template:Campaignbox Burmese–Siamese War (1759–60) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Campaignbox Burmese–Siamese War (1547–1549)

Template:Campaignbox Burmese–Siamese War (1547–1549) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:03, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know when was Fang incoprorated into Ayutthaya?

I typically see Fang (Sawankalok) lumped into the North/Lan Na, but my references note that a monk led a breakaway state in Fang during the 1767-71 civil war. So far, that's the earliest I've seen as Fang being associated with Ayutthaya. Yourlocallordandsavior (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Kaleinaung

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Kaleinaung, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Battle of Pho Sam Ton

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Battle of Pho Sam Ton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 24 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Kaleinaung

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Kaleinaung".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Battle of Pho Sam Ton

Hello, Tanakorn Srichaisuphakit. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Battle of Pho Sam Ton".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:32, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daolaogui moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Daolaogui, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Storchy (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Daolaogui

Hello, EditingGuy564738. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daolaogui, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:01, 19 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, EditingGuy564738. Thank you for your work on Siege of Ayutthaya (1766–1767). User:SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for writing the article on Wikipedia! I genuinely appreciate your efforts in creating the article on Wikipedia and expanding the sum of human knowledge in Wikipedia. Wishing you and your family a great day!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:21, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

List of Thai girl groups moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to List of Thai girl groups. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is a poor translation. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Schminnte ^{[talk to me]} 16:18, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Thai girl groups

The article List of Thai girl groups has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is not ready for the main space and should be draftified, but the draft already exists at Draft:List of Thai girl groups.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 19:17, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about List of Thai girl groups

Hello EditingGuy564738, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, List of Thai girl groups, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Thai girl groups.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Cremastra}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

🌺 Cremastra (talk) 19:31, 31 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]