Jump to content

User talk:TamraRoper

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

openly

[edit]

No-one is described as being "openly" heterosexual, so why is it still a term used about LGBT+? Yes, it could be very relevant in some current day cultures, and relevant in historical contexts, but usually if a reliable source reports on someone's sexual orientation (as it must to be on Wikipedia) then "openly" can be assumed, and use of the word could be taken as suggesting an opinion on the matter. Escape Orbit (Talk) 14:31, 21 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Marquis de la Eirron per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
RoySmith (talk) 16:06, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]