User talk:Tamilvendan

File copyright problem with File:Manorama.acchi.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Manorama.acchi.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro^(talk) 15:04, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tamilvendan. You have new messages at Ravichandar84's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 15:46, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Manorama.acchi.JPG

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from www.thiraipadam.com/images/artists/Manorama1.jpeg. As a copyright violation, File:Manorama.acchi.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Manorama.acchi.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Manorama.acchi.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Manorama.acchi.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Manorama.acchi.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan (talk) 18:34, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.thiraipadam.com/cgi-bin/artist.pl?id=263&lang=english. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan (talk) 18:37, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG

Hello. Concerning your contribution, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://l.yimg.com/t/movies/galatta/20080805/09/Tamil_cine20080731-1_1217929221_large.jpg, http://in.movies.yahoo.com/news-detail/30705/Tamil-cinema-losing-identity-Bharathi-Raja.html. As a copyright violation, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]] and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]] with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on [[Talk:File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG]].

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you. ShivNarayanan (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG] listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Prominent.Kallars.JPG], has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the [[Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 March 11#Prominent.Kallars.JPG]|discussion]] to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. ShivNarayanan (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC) ShivNarayanan (talk) 19:02, 11 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kallar

Heya,

I have no intention of deleting the article but I disagree that the Cholas or any of the others like Malayaman are Kallars. If you can post a source that says that the Cholas are Kallars then it'll be good. I've also broken Pallava-Chola theory as it is not true. You seem to come up short on the history of Athondai. Do you know what happened to him after karikala crowned him and left? So we can try and move forward if you can post some sources on the talk page. I will also try to dig up some sources. ShivNarayanan (talk) 06:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course! We, here, work on improving this encyclopedia, not on destroying it. Please add more refs to the article; especially on the claims that Kallars became impoverished on the arrival of the British and that the rule of Kallars in the Cauvery delta region ended when the region was conquered by the Vijayanagar Empire. If you cannot find enough references, I'll definitely help you.-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 01:54, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A Google Books search might probably be of help to find reliable new references. Alternately, you may also try the 7-volume Castes and Tribes of Southern India. You can also download the volume. Thanks-The Enforcer _{Office of the secret service} 02:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Shivnarayana

I don’t know anything about attondai and can you give any reference for stating attondai As a son of Karikala in history, I am talking about Thondaiman Ilandarayan he was the first Thondaiman King who ruled thondaimandalam During Sangam period, there is lot of reference for his existence (Read Purananuru).

You keep on asking reference though I have given many, please mention for which you want reference exactly.

If Malayaman, Paluvetarayar, Melkondar or not Kallars, Please tell me anyone else using this Surnames.

Hereafter Please don’t delete anything. Mention your question (Please mention clearly exactly for what you want reference) in my talk page I will give you reference there are lot of reference available.

Your edits to Kallar page

Your edits to Kallar page are unreasonable. I have explained my concerns on the Kallar talk page. Adding sources about Cholas or Pallavas or their marriages to other communties like "Malayaman" and insisting that you have added references makes me wonder if you are dodging the actual dispute. First provide sources that quote "the cholas are Kallars", "the Pallavas are Kallars", "the Pallavas were offshoot of Cholas", etc. This is the main dispute. ShivNarayanan (talk) 04:57, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of 3RR rule

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kallar_(caste). Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. ShivNarayanan (talk) 22:08, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

24h William M. Connolley (talk) 23:05, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]