User talk:Tamas Szabo

This user may have left Wikipedia. Tamas Szabo has not edited Wikipedia since 2 October 2014. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Tamas Szabo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! - Introvert • ~ 10:18, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Started first

January 21. 2007

hungarian writers historic places in Budapest

You've recently edited the Hungarian literature article. As the title of this new section doesn't really make sense (at least in English), and I'm not sure that this topic should belong to the Hungarian literature article, if you cannot justify it, I'll revert the edit. Lelkesa 13:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. This places and some 1-3 others are important in hungarian literature 20th century and topic can be extended. The subtitle is not the best. ..... t.sz.

Sorry, but I've reverted your edits. Your work is not lost, you can see it at the history of the page. The topic you began to work on is important. However, I suppose it should belong to one of the articles related to Budapest or a new article should be created, as this article mainly focuses on the history of Hungarian literature, and is not about some important places in Budapest. Lelkesa 15:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ádám! My intention: in the Hungarian literature (around "Nyugat", New York Cafe, ...) are some very unique places in Budapest to document for someone intersted in "Hungarian literature". Writers lived in winter (heating costs) mostly in special locations. Meeting together here war important for the Works! ... and many Hungarian writer was "local-patriots", coined to near Neighbourhoods Márai, Kosztolányi, ..! Can you help me to place this idea on the right way? Tamas Szabo 17:36, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Translation into English

Hello Tamas, your requests for help with translation from Hungarian may be actually placed at Wikipedia:Translation. There's also a Wikipedia project for quick accidental translations, that's where the {{translate}} template refers to. I've put Danube Promenade up at Pages needed translation as this work of yours looks almost done, but whole articles brought from another language wikipedias should not go there, really. So translation of Krisztina Téri Iskolam, for example, will be best requested at Wikipedia:Translation. Best wishes - Introvert • ~ 10:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for help! I need time for orientation. Big surprise: My first, for me very important page Naphegy (whole article) was yesterday translated by an professional translator only in 1-2 days! Thank User:Alensha. - Tamas Szabo 10:39, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome. I'm very glad to hear that User:Alensha has worked on translation, she's a very experienced editor and must've done a great job. Congratulations! I don't want to interfere with your work but just thinking, wouldn't it be a good idea to just ask Alensha directly if she is available for help with the rest of your material? And certainly, take your time for settling comfortably. Happy editing! - Introvert • ~ 20:28, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jacob Steiner

Tamas, thanks for all of the good work you're doing. I noticed you've added links to the Jacob Steiner page from several other pages like Taste, Olfaction, and Electrophysiology. Steiner certainly is a major contributor to some of these fields, but I think it is probably a inappopriate link. One could list a dozen more seminal figures in Taste and Olfaction, and easily hundreds in Electrophysiology. It isn't appropriate to hightlight just one guy. SJS1971 13:54, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your attention. I have you undrestand. I need time for orientation, only a few days in Wikipedia. Tamas Szabo 13:57, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! Keep contributing, that's great. SJS1971

License tagging for Image:Wallenberg-Minerva-u.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Wallenberg-Minerva-u.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:06, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:06, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon2.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:08, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 00:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey 00:08, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg as you can see the source is in the name Meyers Lexikon 1905 this is > 100 years old. Tamas Szabo 07:57, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Margitsziget-1905-Meyers-Lexikon3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. feydey 12:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since You didn't create that map, but copied it from Mayers Lexikon then the licence was wrong. Please pick a correct one, Wikipedia:Image_copyright_tag page should help You in choosing. Best, feydey 12:16, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

{{PD-Meyers}} — image comes from the 4th edition of Meyers Konversationslexikon (1888)
????? — image comes from Meyers Konversationslexikon (1905)

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License.

This template should only be used on file pages.

A képet bárki használhatja vagy módosíthatja az eredeti szerző megnevezésével.

This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide.

In case this is not legally possible:
The copyright holder grants any entity the right to use this work for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

— when the creator has made a statement releasing the work to public domain

Death

Here is his correct death from the Death Index:

PAUL STERLING 03 Sep 1915 18 Jan 1994 90006 (Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA) (none specified) 141-32-9949 New Jersey)

--Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 00:18, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I send you the copy of my documents by Email. Tamas Szabo 02:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wallenberg

I had to temporarily move your addition to the article to the talk page while that section is getting edited. The article is still under review for Good Article status so no additions were supposed to made until it is off review. we can add your after the review and before the vote for Featured article. Your friend: --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) 01:03, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have no more extensions. Can You help me to correct this section to get it ready? Tamas Szabo 03:31, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please als corrections to Pal Szalai and Karoly Szabo. Tamas Szabo 03:34, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ADDED FOLLOWING TO WALLENBERG DICUSSION PAGE:

I will be happy to review and edit the text for English. If you live in Budapest suggest bringing the Holocaust Museum's attention to this episode - and maybe also contacting the House of Terror (although people I trust in/from Hungary tell me it is very political).

Many historians write that Stalin was planning a major early 1953 initiative against Jews, preceded by execution of Jewish writers in the USSR, execution of Michoels (?) and purges of others from the war time Jewish Anti-Fascist League, purge/execution of the Czechoslovak party leadership - many of whom were Jews, purge in Hungary (Rakosi arresting Peter Gabor (?) head of AVO/AVH) etc. Shortly before Stalin's death there were plans for the "Doctors' Trial". It is said that the plan was to find them guilty (as in other show trials), publicly execute them, perhaps on Red Square - unprecedented in the USSR and the Soviet colonies (e.g. Hungary) - and then "protect the Jews" from "righteous indignation of the proletariat" by transfer to Siberia to open shacks ... some feel the plan included the transports attacked by the "indignant proletariat" and many Jews killed en route. The Gulag and -40 Celsius cold can kill as easily as Zyklon gas!

Stalin collapsed March 1 1953 shortly before the supposed massive deportation plan could be launched - and died few days later (March 5). Curiously, March 1, 1953 was the Jewish holiday Purim, to remember that long ago another potential mass murderer of Jews, Haman, was killed just before he could carry out his plan. The plans to center a fake show trial in Budapest around Raoul Wallenberg, the rescuer of Jews, fits well into Stalin's and the Soviet system's plans at the time and Stalin's macabre humor. It is curious that a man like Wallenberg could stand up against the Nazis and many murderous Hungarian Fascists, and antisemites in the army, police and in the population, but apparently there were no Wallenbergs to rescue people from the Communists. Emesz 22:05, 17 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shoes on the Danube

Thanks for answering the questions, I hope the text as I've edited it reflects what you intend to be in the article. It's been quite interesting reading this as it is a chapter of history that is fuzzy for me. Please let me know if you feel the edits have made the article worse and I'll try to remember to put the questions on the discussion page next time! -Yupik 08:41, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Looking good

It's been quite interesting following how your pages are developing! Thanks for doing such an important job! -Yupik 06:04, 22 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Naphegy coordinates

Thanks for pointing out the error in the Naphegy geotag.

I've now changed it to what I hope is the correct location, based on the maps given in the article: could you check it, please? -- The Anome

Thank You, this is near to the exact position (20 meter to the left from the middle of a circle) Tamas Szabo 14:52, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Pianist2.jpg

Hello Tamas Szabo, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:Pianist2.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Tamas Szabo/Brunsviga. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not readd the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 04:48, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:ThePianist1.jpg

Hello Tamas Szabo, an automated process has found an image or media file tagged as nonfree media, such as fair use. The image (Image:ThePianist1.jpg) was found at the following location: User:Tamas Szabo/Brunsviga. This image or media will be removed per statement number 9 of our non-free content policy. The image or media will be replaced with Image:NonFreeImageRemoved.svg , so your formatting of your userpage should be fine. The image that was replaced will not be automatically deleted, but it could be deleted at a later date. Articles using the same image should not be affected by my edits. I ask you to please not re-add the image to your userpage and could consider finding a replacement image licensed under either the Creative Commons or GFDL license or released to the public domain. Thanks for your attention and cooperation. User:Gnome (Bot)-talk 00:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

non-commercial use only

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:Czakó-utca.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:30, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Also Image:Naphegy-utca.jpg, Image:Naphegy-utca-Gellerthegy-utca.jpg, Image:KomuvesLepcso.jpg, etc. – Quadell ^{(talk) (random)} 19:31, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:PestFromGellertHill 4 50mm crop full.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:PestFromGellertHill 4 50mm crop full.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. This image is watermarked "(c) Gabor Schreiner, 2005 for Wiki" – that does not appear to be a free license as required for GNU/CC-SA-2.5 and a copyright release letter from Gabor Schreiner himself, as Copyright Holder, would be necessary. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. JGHowes^talk - 04:20, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dunakorzo-PestFromGellertHill 50mm.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dunakorzo-PestFromGellertHill 50mm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. –Drilnoth (T • C • L) 20:41, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:PestFromGellertHill 4 50mm crop full.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PestFromGellertHill 4 50mm crop full.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Victor Engel (talk • contribs) 21:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Kiskiralylany.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Kiskiralylany.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [3], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:37, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Margitsziget-air.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Margitsziget-air.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [4], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 05:38, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There are a number of other images you have uploaded which appear to have a similar problem, where the flickr licence does not match the licence you stated on wikipedia. Would you please retrace your steps and maybe tag the unsuitable ones yourself for deletion. Agathoclea (talk) 07:05, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Taban-bontas-utan.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Taban-bontas-utan.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:55, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Krisztinater-Zograf és Zinsler 1872 elott.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krisztinater-Zograf és Zinsler 1872 elott.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 16:58, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Krisztinater-1883-utan-ismeretlen.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Krisztinater-1883-utan-ismeretlen.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:36, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Negresco-ft.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Negresco-ft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 17:41, 21 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011

Please be aware of wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest and promoting your own scholarship. Fifelfoo (talk) 06:06, 28 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Negresco-ft GS-optimiert.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Negresco-ft GS-optimiert.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Acather96 (talk) 19:25, 2 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Staircase inside the Retirement house Manfréd Weiss (1938).jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Staircase inside the Retirement house Manfréd Weiss (1938).jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 13:19, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The 1931 Bauhaus exhibition street.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The 1931 Bauhaus exhibition street.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 13:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:The 1931 Bauhaus exhibition street 2.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:The 1931 Bauhaus exhibition street 2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 13:21, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Retirement house Manfréd Weiss 1938.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Retirement house Manfréd Weiss 1938.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted images or text borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Kelly ^hi! 13:23, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Otto Fleischmann"

A page you created, Otto Fleischmann, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is a blatant copyright infringement.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. NickCT (talk) 04:42, 13 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bad working conditions in Wikipedia with such fanatic fighters. We are not machines, to check copys only by sotftware. Please contact, we are human!

You did not read the text, was here as you marked it: Otto Fleischmann papers, 1910-1985 Otto Fleischmann papers, Library of Congress has been dedicated to the public (PDF; 23 kB)

Your too fast markings are against friendly cooperation. Shame! Copyright Status: Copyright in the unpublished writings of Otto Fleischmann in these papers and in other collections of papers in the custody of the Library of Congress has been dedicated to the public.

If you find other copys of this text by software then it is far from violation.

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:Budapest - bei Nacht, Burg Sued.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:28, 2 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Kápolna.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Kápolna.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dunapart-ft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Dunapart-ft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:52, 25 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Kepregidunaparticorso1.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Kepregidunaparticorso1.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:42, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Kepregidunaparticorso2.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Kepregidunaparticorso2.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:43, 26 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 17 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hotel-Dunapartft.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Szabo-Dezso-Horvathkert.jpg

The file File:Szabo-Dezso-Horvathkert.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Szathmary-K-Buda-Castle.jpg

The file File:Szathmary-K-Buda-Castle.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]