User talk:Taltos

This is Taltos's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1

Has this user made a silly mistake? DON'T USE THE TROUT!

Welcome to the absoluety amazing talk page of none other than taltos.

Teahouse?

idk if you are familiar with the Teahouse but it's pretty awesome a cool way to help new users out. I didn't really realize what it was until I looked but it seems like something you might be interested in. You can become a host and start introducing people to wp / answering questions on the teahouse page :) ― Levi_OP^Talk 15:41, 16 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Should vandalism really be capitalized on your page?

I don't think that vandalism is a proper noun even the in context of wikipedia ― Levi_OP^Talk 16:03, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

HEY! This is MY page! Vandalism can be capitalized if I say so. If you have any further issues. EMAIL ME. ― TaltosKieronTalk 16:23, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Use talk pages please

I can't help but notice that you responded to something that I said on my userpage INLINE in the text of the article. There are these awesome things called talk pages that you can use to talk about things on the page. Please use those instead, you fucking moron. ― Levi_OP^Talk 16:17, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The reason I did that is because I KNEW you would rage so hard, and it's downright hilarious. ― TaltosKieronTalk 16:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I broke rules on wikipedia because i knew it would make you mad

― Levi_OP^Talk 17:00, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MFer please, it's your user page and frankly, WP:IDGAF. Also COPE! You got trolled and now you're mad. Keep crying, son. ― TaltosKieronTalk 17:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. why did you change the thing to say stolen. I didn't ask you to do that and that's WEIRD!! ― Levi_OP^Talk 16:20, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's very funny. + don't care + didn't ask. ― TaltosKieronTalk 16:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

P.P.S. do you wanna add some smash bros userboxes to your page? also you asked me to make you a mgs userbox then never told me what to do with it ― Levi_OP^Talk 16:25, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't TELL you I just said I was thinking about it. I might add SSB userboxes. ― TaltosKieronTalk 16:47, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alllllllsssooooooo can you ping me when you respond with the {{Ping}} template so that I get a notification when you respond. Thanks a lot, lovingly (not), ― Levi_OP^Talk 17:02, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Levi_OP:

STFU! ― TaltosKieronTalk 17:06, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's not how you ping someone. Just typing @ doesn't do anything. You have to use the template for it to work. ― Levi_OP^Talk 17:31, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh my god, I don't know if I'm the master of trolling but you must be the master of falling for trolls because oh my lord that was not hard to see. ― TaltosKieronTalk 19:39, 22 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trollface_non-free.png ― Levi_OP^Talk 15:50, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

That's a really cool story bro File:Trollface_non-free.png. ― TaltosKieronTalk 16:30, 23 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

interesting conversation ☯︎𝕎𝕚𝕜𝕚𝕡𝕖𝕕𝕚𝕒𝕟 🗣🔥 21:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

potential efficiency increase

On the comment you left on Talk:Kenosha_unrest_shooting#September_2021 you manually typed out [[File:Yes check.svg|20px|link=]] '''Done'''. I don't know if you're aware but there is just a Template:Done that you're supposed to use instead. A lot of things are made like this to be done faster. Maybe use this in the future? Love, (i hate you), ― Levi_OP^Talk 13:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template Done is stupid and I don't care also it wasn't slower. Good Day! ― TaltosKieronTalk 13:41, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There isn't a realistic world where however you got that was somehow faster then typing out a 4 character template. This is a massive cope and I suggest you just MOVE ON and heed my advice. ― Levi_OP^Talk 13:50, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stan Kessler (October 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by 331dot was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stan Kessler and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stan Kessler, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

331dot (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, TaltosKieron! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 331dot (talk) 06:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"QAaron" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect QAaron and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 February 21#QAaron until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:13, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:49, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Look at this kitten

Your profile is pretty cool, so I wanted to share a photo of a kitten with you.

Xan ✨ talk 🌟 21:21, 24 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:01, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]