User talk:Talkwiki7708

April 2015

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:NeilN comments confirm agenda, objective editing is disputed. There is no legal threat, as you would understand readily if English/American dialect was your first language.

Talkwiki7708 (talk) 01:49, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Curious, then, that you were the first to say that "this is now a legal matter".[1] —C.Fred (talk) 01:58, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Possible legal threat at Talk:RKO Radio Network. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 22:29, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:00, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately you seem to have no idea how Wikipedia works, nor are you apparently interested in understanding. Your comment here is not only misleading, but patently false since the "wikifoundation" does not "investigate wikieditors", nor is it likely that you received anything other than a suggestion to deal with content problems on Wikipedia from the Legal folks (assuming you actually corresponded with them) because that's how it works, nor can I see any point to the Worldcom bit unless your overall intent is to simply cause a chilling effect in other involved editors - the very reason our policy against legal threats exists. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 23:05, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]