I am mind as well.

My Introduction

I am mind as well

I update to what is good and what is bad.
Without mind updating about bad, how will anyone avoid bad?

Know the place well before editing

Why wikipedia does what it does?

What wikipedia expects as contribution?

Is recommending changes in policy considered contribution?

How to and from where does one recommend changes to the policies, if recommending changes are considered as contributions?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

How to and from where does one recommend changes to the policies, if recommending changes are considered as contributions? Talktomemind (talk) 04:05, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Essentially every policy on Wikipedia is the product of community consensus and can be changed when the community decides to change it. That being said, the consideration given to change proposals will vary

change proposals coming "out of the blue", with no preliminary discussion or background will likely be ignored or "hatted"
change proposals that rehash earlier declined proposals will need some new angle for them to be considered
change proposals from well-established editors who give evidence of broad understanding of Wikipedia policies will be given precedence over those from relative newbies

So, if you are thinking about proposing a change, spend a good long time contributing to the project under the existing regime and make an effort to understand why things are the way they are. You will discover along the way where to make change proposals and how to engage in discussions with fellow editors. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:40, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

What rules and regulations does wikipedia choose to act over towards fact checking, in short, what epistemic system does wikipedia follow?

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Are there any fixed rules and regulations that wikipedia choose to act over towards fact checking, in order to take administrative decisions? Talktomemind (talk) 05:03, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Only legitimate use of this page is for requesting unblock while you're blocked. Please go back to your original account and request unblock if you want to contribute to the encyclopedia. Thanks. Masum Reza^📞 08:15, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of ProtectorOfWorldSaves (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am not going to ask to unblock me. I guess that wikipedia may be misused corrupt lobbies if any to push the monopoly of already established co-operates. So, I am trying to work on that problem. Which is a good intention. I am no danger to wikipedia. Neither I am any danger to any large corporation. Just that I am trying to close all the vulnerable doors. You cannot stop me as I am helped by GOD. I am going by his instructions. Talktomemind (talk) 08:31, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]