User talk:Talkischeapened

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Talkischeapened (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this my individual and only account not a "puppet" or a "muppet": unblock my account

Decline reason:

It is clear that all of you are working together to disrupt the St Benedict's School article, or you are all the same person; in either case, the intent was the same, and blocking is still warranted. –MuZemike 20:04, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(EC decline) The checkuser results at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PromisesWeKeep are pretty definitive; you'd have to explain why you, as a separate account, were not only sharing an IP with other editors but editing in precisely the same fashion as them as well. Commanding us to unblock your account is bad form, as well - typically, the successful requests for unblocking are the ones that say "please" and follow the Guide to Appealing Blocks. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 20:05, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]