User talk:Talkingturkey

Jason Isaacs: Deletion of information without reasons being given

Hi. You've deleted from the article "Jason Isaacs" information that is properly referenced without giving any reason in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. That is not the way to improve the article. If you feel there is a good reason why the information should not be in the article, please state it on the article's talk page so that the matter can be discussed with other editors and consensus reached on whether the information should remain in the article or not. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 03:22, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I see that you've continued to delete information from the article that is properly referenced, as well as an image that is correctly licensed to the Wikimedia Commons. I urge you to discuss the matter on the article's talk page so that your reasons for making these edits can be discussed by the Wikipedia community. If you continue to delete the material while refusing to discuss the matter, your edits may be regarded as disruptive and you may find yourself blocked from editing. — Cheers, JackLee ^–talk– 05:55, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Final reminder

Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, your edits to Jason Isaacs, did not appear to conform with Wikipedia policies and guidelines:

Adding content without citing a reliable source, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Material that is unsourced or poorly sourced will be reverted or removed by other editors or administrators later. Read here for help on citing sources.
No edit summary: This is considered an important guideline. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you amend or delete any text; otherwise, people may question your motives for the edit i.e. likely vandals or trolls.
The tone or style of your edits is not appropriate for Wikipedia. Neutral point of view is one of the five pillars of Wikipedia. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia.
Possible conflict of interest: If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, whereby an editor must forego advancing the aims of Wikipedia in order to advance outside interests, that editor stands in a conflict of interest according to your tone of edit and edit history to date. COI edits are strongly discouraged. When they cause disruption to the encyclopedia in the opinion of an uninvolved administrator, they may lead to accounts being blocked and embarrassment for the individuals and groups who were being promoted. See reported cases at COI Notice Board and the outcome of a previous COI case here

Please stop and note the above guidelines in order to avoid any unnecessary disputes and frustration later. If you feel very strongly that your edits are suitable for inclusion, bring it up at the article talk page for further discussion, but do not revert your edits again. Doing so with a lack of consensus is seen as disruptive editing, and you may be blocked next. Thank you. -- Aldwinteo (talk) 16:45, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2013

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Jason Isaacs has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Jason Isaacs was changed by Talkingturkey (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878015 on 2013-04-17T22:45:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:45, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at City of London, you may be blocked from editing. DBaK (talk) 07:36, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]