User talk:Taliskerbay
Welcome to Wikipedia!
[edit]
|
Hello, Taliskerbay! I'd like to invite you to join the Percy Jackson task force. We work on improving Percy Jackson & the Olympians articles and would appreciate your help. Cheers! Airplaneman talk 01:33, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- And extra thanks for your work regarding Rachel Elizabeth Dare as well as the Oracle! Airplaneman talk 02:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 02:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Airplaneman talk 02:32, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to the PJTF!
[edit]I second Airplaneman's thanks for your work on Rachel Elizabeth Dare and welcome to the Percy Jackson Task Force! Happy editing! PrincessofLlyr (talk) 03:21, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
- Just a suggestion, but PJTF also has a userbox. It is {{Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Outreach/User Percy Jackson task force}}. If you copy that it will produce this:
This user is a member of the Rick Riordan task force.
--PrincessofLlyr (talk) 18:07, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
Roll Call for the Percy Jackson Task Force
[edit]We are holding a roll call to see who is still active and/or interested in the project. Please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject Novels/Percy Jackson Task Force#Members for instructions.
This roll call will go on for two months, commencing on February 12, 2010 and ending on April 12, 2010. Regards, Airplaneman talk 21:46, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Percy Jackson Task Force Dispatch
[edit]- 11 March 2010
Hello Taliskerbay,
We'd like to introduce the PJTF Dispatch, a new publication from the Percy Jackson Task Force. With project updates, important collaboration announcements, related topics, selected content, and much more, we're pleased to deliver this newsletter to all Percy Jackson Task Force Members! Want to help out? Visit the Newsletter Coordination page or just sit back and enjoy the newsletter!
Sincerely,
The Percy Jackson Task Force Team
- You are receiving this notice because you are listed here. If you no longer wish to receive these notices, make a note next to your name it that you wish to opt-out of the newsletter (or remove it). Notice delivery by xenobot 15:31, 11 March 2010 (UTC)
- 17 March 2010
Hello Taliskerbay,
We'd like to announce the Percy Jackson Portal, a place for selected content and all things Percy Jackson! We're working on adding content and sprucing up the portal and we really need your help! Come by the project page or swing by Portal:Percy Jackson and see what's up!
Sincerely,
The Percy Jackson Task Force Team
- You are receiving this notice because you are listed here. If you no longer wish to receive these notices, make a note next to your name it that you wish to opt-out of the newsletter. Notice delivery by xenobot 01:10, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
Tracker Task Force
[edit]Hello, Taliskerbay! I'd like to invite you to join the Trackers Task Force. If you are interested in Patrick Carman's series The Trackers, you are perfect for this Wikipedia Project! Just add your name to the support list to join! The task force is under construction, so maybe you can help. Goodbye!!! Hidividedby5 (talk) 22:22, 22 June 2010 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In Salutary neglect, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Constituent (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
[edit]Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 3 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Capecodcracy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- uncited Neologism
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 01:17, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
The article Capecodcracy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- WP:NEOLOGISM; "capecodcracy" gets exactly two ghits, one of which is this article, and the other is in WP user space. Wikipedia:Wikipedia is not for things made up one day
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Nat Gertler (talk) 03:40, 6 January 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Capecodcracy for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Capecodcracy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capecodcracy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Funnyfarmofdoom (talk to me) 07:06, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited New Silver Beach, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Settlement (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:08, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Catholic Ivy League for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Catholic Ivy League is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Catholic Ivy League until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. GrapedApe (talk) 13:23, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, Taliskerbay! I'd like to invite you to join the new Rick Riordan Task Force (formerly the "Percy Jackson" Task Force), which works to improve articles related to Rick Riordan and his books. Check out our project page or contact me to learn more! -- 2ReinreB2 (talk) 05:24, 4 May 2016 (UTC) |
RRTF Roll-call: November 2024
[edit]
♦ Hello, Taliskerbay! This message represents your invite to the annual Rick Riordan task force roll-call. It has been a year since our last check-in, and all members are being asked to quickly reaffirm their participation. Our membership options are: Active, Supporter, and Inactive (see our members page for more information). You are currently listed as Inactive. If you ever return to Wikipedia, consider this message your invitation to rejoin! This applies even after the current roll-call ends. |