User talk:Taliashwartz

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome!

Cyberbullying: People v. Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Ct. App. NY July 1, 2014)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Cyberbullying: People v. Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Ct. App. NY July 1, 2014), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://blog.ericgoldman.org/archives/2014/07/criminal-cyberbullying-statute-violates-first-amendment-new-york-v-marquan.htm.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cyberbullying: People v. Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Ct. App. NY July 1, 2014)

Your article says that it is a draft. I'm going to move your article to the draft namespace, if that's OK with you? In the draft namespace, you can work on it at your leisure, and when you're ready, it can be checked and published by a Articles for Creation editor. Tek022 | Comments? 02:13, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have moved your draft page to Draft:Cyberbullying: People v. Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Ct. App. NY July 1, 2014). You can work on your article here uninhibited until you wish to publish it. Again, you can talk to any of the very helpful editors at Articles for Creation for assistance! Tek022 | Comments? 02:35, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Taliashwartz, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Taliashwartz! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:10, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Kharkiv07. I noticed that you recently removed all content from Draft:Cyberbullying: People v. Marquan M., 2014 WL 2931482 (Ct. App. NY July 1, 2014), with this edit without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, I restored the page's content. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Kharkiv07 (talk) 00:13, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your note Kharkiv07. I am new here as you may notice, so I appropriate you being patient. I have been advised I should work on the article in my "talk"/sandbox rather than as a draft, which is why I deleted the content. How can I delete a draft page (or even before that, should I?). Thanks taliashwartz

Hello! I apologize for marking it as blanking, but on the draft I have tagged it for speedy deletion on the grounds that the author requests deletion. Thanks and if you need anything else I'm happy to be of assistance! Kharkiv07 (talk) 00:36, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for the promptness Kharkiv07. I might need help down the road, what is the best why to ask for help here? Should I add your name-tag to my talk page? Or should I leave a "massage" on your talk page? Thank you! taliashwartz

Either leave me a message on my talk page or put "{{Talkback|Taliashwartz}}" on my talk page if you write a message here. Kharkiv07 (talk) 00:45, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The page has been deleted, I hope the new one goes well! Kharkiv07 (talk) 01:55, 6 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kharkiv07. The article I am working on is a legal case summary, which refers to (and quote) parts of the court opinion. My main concern is that it will be auto-deleted based on alleged copyright infringement (because of quotes). That's what happened the first time I tries to upload the article's content - see the action by CorenSearchBot at 01:00, 13 February 2015 (UTC).Any advise on that? Taliashwartz[reply]

Well since it's a court opinion it should be public domain, my advice would be to cite the opinion directly instead of going through another source, as any and all works by the US government are not eligible for copyright protection (per 17 USC 105), so you should be good. If you cite it directly and the bot still picks it up, I'd see if the bot has a way to report an error, as most bots do, or take it up on the bot's talk page, because a direct quote from either a state court or a federal court would be usable under Wikipedia's copyright policy. Kharkiv07 (talk) 02:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps here? Kharkiv07 (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I also did move the page to here, as that's the preferred location for AfC articles. Kharkiv07 (talk) 02:30, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: People v Marquan M. has been accepted

People v Marquan M., which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kharkiv07 (talk) 02:43, 8 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Kharkiv07!

Anytime. I'm currently working on getting it nominated for the "Did You Know?" section on the home page. Kharkiv07 ^Talk 00:57, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for People v. Marquan M.

On 15 April 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article People v. Marquan M., which you recently created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that People v. Marquan M. was the first case in which a US court weighed the constitutionality of criminalizing cyberbullying? You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, live views, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Crisco 1492 (talk) 16:26, 15 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]