User talk:Taksraven

Welcome!

Hello, Taksraven, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! - KNM ^Talk 15:37, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bass high

A tag has been placed on Bass high, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Plasticup ^T/C 02:17, 12 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Please read and understand wikipedias policy concerning excessive reverting here at WP:3RR. You are coming dangerously close at Peter Costello. Prester John ^{-(Talk to the Hand)} 01:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oct 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions, including your edits to Peter Costello. However, please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that biographical information about living persons must not be libelous. Any controversial statements about a living person added to an article must include proper sources. Thank you. Shot info 06:53, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or controversial information about living persons to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bob Ellis. Thank you. Please review the various links on how to be a better editor on the top of this page. Shot info 23:56, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Peter Costello. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Recurring dreams 12:28, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Australian federal election, 2004, you will be blocked from editing. Recurring dreams 12:38, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to The Smirks, you will be blocked from editing. Please cease with this, you are starting to look like a WP:SPA Shot info 23:41, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External Links

Come on mate, you've made some good contributions in the past, so you're not a vandal. Please stop adding the link to the Costello youtube video, it's not really appropriate. Recurring dreams 12:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Judith Lucy.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Judith Lucy.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Genisock2 (talk) 12:26, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Star Destroyer, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --EEMIV (talk) 02:59, 19 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Grumpy Justins

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Grumpy Justins, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no real notability show, lacks sources in article and in searches, reads like POV OR mixed with fabrication, one ref provided is useless

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Duffbeerforme (talk) 15:06, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Peter Costello. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. LibStar (talk) 02:20, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. LibStar (talk) 02:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Editing

These types of edits and edit summaries [1] [2] [3] are unacceptable personal attacks, disruption, and violations of the biographies of living persons Policy . If you continue, you will be blocked. Dreadstar † 02:54, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest that you stop engaging with the other editor, and if you see vandalism, personal attacks or other negative behaviors, then bring it to an administrator, the anti-vandalism notice board or the administrator's noticeboard. Dreadstar † 03:22, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you have real concerns about someone's editing, then instead of attacking others in edit summaries and on talk pages, take it to an appropriate authority, such as WP:ANI or even the conflict of interest noticeboard. If you're in a content dispute, then use the appropriate steps as outlined in Dispute resolution. Continuing your current behavior will only lead to your being blocked. Dreadstar † 03:30, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]