Jump to content

User talk:TakeHaru03

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:Takeshi Ishii)

Introduction

[edit]

Hello welcome to my talk page! (NOTE: This is just an introduction, not a topic)

Talk pages

[edit]

Hello TakeHaru03! Please read Help:Talk to learn how to better navigate talk pages. The purpose of talk pages is to manage work on the article. They are not to be used to make eye-catching posts like this one. twsabin 03:58, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, so much! TakeHaru03 03:44, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:2022 Russian invasion of Ukraine for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Pabsoluterince (talk) 06:53, 7 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:SiM (band). Sjö (talk) 08:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, new users!

[edit]

How are you feeling right now?

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:25, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 8)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rusalkii was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rusalkii (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, TakeHaru03! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 04:27, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

[edit]

Suppressed edits

[edit]
Hi, TakeHaru03, I have unfortunately had to suppress some of your edits because they reveal too much personally identifiable information about you. We have a policy of protecting editors' safety by hiding such information if they share it. I'm really sorry about having to suppress your edits, and I know it's annoying, but it's for the best. Please don't re-add the information. For some useful information on privacy and safety, you can take a look at Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors and Wikipedia:On privacy, confidentiality and discretion. Thanks, and sorry for messing about with your pages! KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 03:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's okay, I know they're too controversial and sensitive to others. Takeshi Ishii 03:10, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
THe issue isn't that they're controversial or sensitive. They revealed info about you that would allow someone to find out who you are in real life and would allow them to harass you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:11, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Blaze Wolf, you are not helping. Stop sticking your nose in. This message does not require an acknowledgement. GeneralNotability (talk) 03:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oof, I can't believe of what am I doing. Takeshi Ishii 03:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also, please change your signature as it also contains personally identifiable info. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 03:12, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I don't have one, I guess... Takeshi Ishii 03:13, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

KevinL (aka L235 · t · c) 03:07, 11 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, article talk pages do not exist to discuss the subject of the article.

[edit]

I'm trying to avoid your being blocked - as you've already had a final warning, I could have blocked you for your edits at Talk:Kakistocracy‎. Doug Weller talk 12:02, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Windows 10 users requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. * Pppery * it has begun... 16:53, 19 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use talk pages for inappropriate discussions, as you did at Talk:Vladimir Putin. —MelbourneStartalk 07:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for Continuing to use talk pages as forums despite warnings.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Doug Weller talk 12:26, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TakeHaru03 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will not use the talk pages as forums ever again. Takeshi Ishii 23:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I would want something a little more concrete in order to consider unblocking you. I am closing this request, but you may make another to try to convince someone else that unblocking you will benefit the encyclopedia. 331dot (talk) 00:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So what contributions do you want to make towards building an encyclopedia? 331dot (talk) 23:53, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My contributions is to edit some articles including controversial ones. TakeHaru03 (talk) 7:57, 18 April 2022 (PHT)

My advice would be to stay away from controversial topics/articles until you gain some experience, but what articles do you want to edit? 331dot (talk) 00:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It depends of how good it is. Takeshi Ishii 00:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TakeHaru03 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am currently learning controversial topics in a neutral manner, and I'm taking responsibility as a person.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you:
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 11:58, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Concern regarding User:TakeHaru03/sandbox

[edit]

Information icon Hello, TakeHaru03. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:TakeHaru03/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 8 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Philippine current date

[edit]

Template:Philippine current date has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 21:41, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]