User talk:Tailertoo

Tailertoo's talk page.

Harmonia1 wishes you life and everlasting glory

Hi there, tailertoo.Harmonia1 (talk) 22:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

More about me, Tailertoo

I am a very private person. Since someone has claimed I don't exist because it would be more convenient if I didn't, I'll say a bit more about myself. My interests are in the area of the arts, literature and sciences, and philosophy and history. I have a demanding job, where the rules for behavior are very strict. I have traveled extensively in other countries. I am just learning about Wikipedia and I will be judicious about making my opinion known, but I am not afraid of controversy. I am a very deep researcher. I don't take kindly to personal attacks and enjoy Wikipedia partly because the rules suggest that such behavior is inappropriate here. Tailertoo (talk) 17:25, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Tailertoo, take it with a grain of salt. The comment on the Non-lethal page is unusual for Wikipedia.Harmonia1 (talk) 17:32, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tailertoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Will you please consider unblock me and the others accused with Harmonia1? I am using a Mac that is on the same dsl that Harmonia1 uses. This shouldn't violate any policies. Harmonia reminded me that she she helped me get my user account registered, showing me how to do it on her PC. If that is where all this trouble has come from, sorry for the confusion. I have been doing all my posts from my Mac. We all share the same servers sometimes. Is that the problem? I have lost interest in the non-lethal site after all this but still am interested in music sites and history sites.Tailertoo (talk) 6:42 pm, Yesterday (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but the checkuser investigation says that this account is "controlled" by Harmonia1. Please request unblocking from your main account. TN X Man 14:04, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tailertoo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Once again I request to be unblocked. I am not 'controlled' by Harmonia1. On the Harmonia1 user talk, one of your people admitted that your group has established that I do exist and am editing from a different computer or computers, therefore am not anyone's sockpuppet. Harmonia1 just offered to help some of us new to Wikipedia on one weekend with the HTML commands that allow edits, so we could navigate the command structure more easily. Then I offended a politico with friends on the nl site who won't stand for opposition and this has turned into a witch hunt. Every assertion made by the witch hunters has been countered. Short of sending you my social security number, there's nothing more I can do. I have my own mind and my own will, but anyone who knows the subject area would have opposed the name change as I did. The result of this will be that most competent people will be afraid to voice their opinions on the nl site. Tailertoo (talk) 16:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

First, the phrase that jpgordon used was "...more likely (given that it appears to be on different computers), multiple people working in concert in the same room on the same topics...". That may be your story, and you may be sticking to it, but if it is than your attempt to use that in your defense here is an admission of meatpuppetry, which is equally forbidden (and, in fact, your descriptions of your group's activtities here tend to support that charge. We don't want your Social Security number ... and even if you gave it to us, it would prove or disprove nothing as there is no way to absolutely tell which human being is behind which keyboard. In addition, I find your self-pitying tone both emotionally damning and demeaning to both me and you. — Daniel Case (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.