User talk:TaerkastUA/Archives/2011/February
This is an archive of past discussions with User:TaerkastUA. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
WP:FILM January 2011 Newsletter
The January 2011 issue of the WikiProject Film newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have an idea for improving the newsletter please leave a message on my talk page. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 03:18, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
TCM
I was working on it as you wrote. Tell me if you think it needs more, or if you don't agree with something I did and we'll see how we can fix it. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 17:19, 2 February 2011 (UTC)
Horror newsletter
Good job on the newsletter stuff. I'll try to find some time to add some items to it. I've been a bit busy in real life at the moment. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
TCM
Hey, you'll need to go through and change all the quote boxes for consistency before any future FAC. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Alignment is fine, everything is supposed to alternate. The boxes themselves appear to be both different in color and style. I assumed the first two were different types of quote boxes. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 14:03, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- I thought the color was added to the others by that editor who felt it would bring a little extra to the page. I think if anything there needs to be a light gray (if you don't like the blue) because white on white makes them blend to easily. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 21:32, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Yes, they need to be consistent with each other. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 23:11, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
request for assistance/advice
Hi, I'm contacting you because of your listing as "Cooordinator" in WikiProject Horror.
I am very concerned about the article for Gorezone magazine, for reasons I outlined on their Talk page a couple of months ago. There's been no response to my concern about its lack of neutrality, and I'm not sure of my next step. I do have a horse in this race, so to speak, because I used to edit Fangoria Magazine (my editing of the Fangoria article is disclosed on the Talk page, as recommended in guidelines, and I've been vigilant in trying to keep that article free of false promotional copy, as has crept in on a few occasions).
During the years I edited Fangoria, we spun off a sister magazine named Gorezone, edited by a friend, which lasted for several years. I don't think it's necessarily an awful thing for another company in another country to resurrect the name, but as an enthusiast of the Wiki, I don't like people using Wikipedia as an advertising medium, and that seems to be what we have.
Your advice will be appreciated, on my talk page, or you can message me at http://www.facebook.com/UncleBob.Martin Bustter (talk) 19:03, 27 February 2011 (UTC)