User talk:Tachyon01
How to use my talk page
Please leave a message. I'll try to reply as soon as I can as it warrants. If I don't right away, I'm probably busy and will get to it shortly. Please sign any messages. Any attacks will be deleted swiftly.
Go to the archives of misc. posts. All message from Jan 20, 2006 to Jun 6, 2006 have been moved to the archives.
Current discussion | |||||
Click on "Post a new message" above to leave your comments[edit]
Re: Re: Barnstar[edit]Absolutely my pleasure :) Teke 03:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC) Chandler Woodcock[edit]Tachyon01, I have done a full summary of Chandler Woodcock several times, but it keeps getting deleted. I was wondering, if you could find out who keeps doing it, using what they call "popups" to delete my article and replace it with trash, I would be thankful. PLEASE, if you can do something to ensure the article on Chandler Woodcock stays in its entirety, I would be grateful. Thank you. :)
nonsense[edit]You sir are most certainly a boor. I'm certainly bummed to have crossed paths with you. Having grown up in the area where the sidehill gouger's live I can definitely tell you that the euphemism I added to the page should remain, but hey I don't have the power that you so mightily wield so probably not eh?
Justin Timberlake[edit]I deleted the statement that Justin Timberlake's next album will be called Extra-Ordinary. You reverted it. In fact, the next album will be entitled FutureSex/LoveSounds. Therefore, I was correct. Thanks, Not A Timberlake Fan, But I Still Know Better Than To Believe Crap
Greetings once again. I have amended 'Provencher Bridge' with an internal link to 'Glen Murray' as per your statement. On the third line of 'Glen Murray', it clearly states that he was the first openly homosexual mayor o a major North American city. As such my edit on "Provencher Bridge' is accurate. As it is a statement of fact, and not opinion, it is perfectly legitimate to stand in Wikipedia. Thank you. Provencher Bridge Vandalism[edit]
Greetings once again. I have amended 'Provencher Bridge' with an internal link to 'Glen Murray' as per your statement. On the third line of 'Glen Murray', it clearly states that he was the first openly homosexual mayor o a major North American city. As such my edit on "Provencher Bridge' is accurate. As it is a statement of fact, and not opinion, it is perfectly legitimate to stand in Wikipedia. Thank you. Thanks[edit]Thank you for fixing the vandalism of my user page by User:Ozmodiar.x on June 5, 2006. I just noticed it, so thanks. I never vandalized his. He probably did it because I'm from Minnesota, and he's from Wisconsin, and he apparently hates Minnesota. So, once again thanks. andrew... 04:25, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
List of beat 'em ups undeletion request[edit]I have nominated List of beat 'em ups to be undeleted, under the reasoning that it is not redundant to the category; it contains many games which are not covered by the category, and may never be able to be covered by it. In addition, the list can do more than the category. It can put date, developer, release date, system, et al., useful especially for articles that would be difficult to create an article for. I hope that you will vote on this and hopefully support its undeletion, on the basis that it does something that makes it not redundant to the category. [2] - A Link to the Past (talk) 22:24, 29 August 2006 (UTC) Complex Numbers[edit]Was wondering if it'd be meaningful to put the Residue Theory book as a subsection in the Complex Analysis book you've contributed to. Fephisto 20:53, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Hey, I am giving a course on real and complex analysis (20 lectures) and I am writing notes for this course. I am consindering to make this freely here available. The text is written in latex. Is there a way to convert this directly into a wikibook-file? Non-free use disputed for Image:Amphoteric pH7.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading Image:Amphoteric pH7.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 17:26, 31 May 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Amphoteric thelastbroadcast.jpg[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Amphoteric thelastbroadcast.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page. If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:59, 12 February 2008 (UTC) Speedy deletion of Template:User UCSC[edit]A tag has been placed on Template:User UCSC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted. If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>). Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC) San Jose Sharks Task Force[edit]
Please note that this task force is still unofficial, and I would like to have at least five members before asking for approval from WP:HOCKEY.
Fair use rationale for Image:Amphoteric desolation.JPG[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Amphoteric desolation.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Amphoteric wtfadm.JPG[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Amphoteric wtfadm.JPG. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:27, 21 May 2008 (UTC) regarding Dan Boyle[edit]No trade has officially gone down so I undid the roster changes you made in the meantime. The rumor I'm hearing now is a four-player deal is in the works. Also some advice when editing the rosters to make it easy on everyone else is to cut Boyle's info from the Tampa roster and vice versa with Carle. That makes sure all info is correct and Boyle is not listed of the two rosters. That is usually how we do it which is hard when some users feel the need to delete UFAs from their last team's roster. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jc121383 (talk • contribs) 17:15, 4 July 2008 (UTC) Proposed deletion of Hancock Astrophysical Observatory[edit] The article Hancock Astrophysical Observatory has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing File permission problem with File:Amphoteric.jpg[edit] Thanks for uploading File:Amphoteric.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license. If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 15:45, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Nomination of Amphoteric (band) for deletion[edit] The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphoteric (band) (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Mattg82 (talk) 18:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC) Speedy deletion nomination of Desolation[edit]
A tag has been placed on Desolation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a musical recording which does not indicate why its subject is important or significant, and where the artist's article has never existed, has been deleted or is eligible for deletion itself. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for music. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mattg82 (talk) 23:15, 21 December 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Amphoteric wtfadm.JPG[edit] Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 10:46, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Understanding cover.jpg[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:03, 23 December 2011 (UTC) Orphaned non-free image File:Tooc cover.jpg[edit]Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:30, 24 December 2011 (UTC) Hi, Hi, |
