User talk:Tac91

September 2024

Hello, I'm Rsjaffe. I noticed that you recently removed content from Niall J. English without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 22:47, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Rsjaffe, I added a publication section... I might have accidently removed something, I am sorry about that. Also, I wanted to ask someone, does publications require citations as well? I believe I have seen a fair amount of academics' pages, and a lot of them don't have citations to their publication. Kindly, guide me in this regard. Thanks. Tac91 (talk) 23:01, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See my reply to your message on my talk page. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 23:57, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok. Thank you. Tac91 (talk) 00:16, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw your edits. Each publication should at least include the journal, issue and pages, and probably best to include author list. In short, should look like references in a scientific publication. — rsjaffe 🗣️ 01:00, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. Thank you. I will write it like you have suggested. Thank you. Tac91 (talk) 01:06, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Tac91! I noticed your contributions to Graham Short and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Tacyarg (talk) 18:05, 16 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot. :) Tac91 (talk) 20:37, 23 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mehdi Manoochehrzadeh (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

First reference is a blog mocked up to look like Forbes, second is an archive of a now-offline blog mocked up to look like the Wall Street Journal, third is the cover of the subject's own book.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mehdi Manoochehrzadeh and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Wikishovel (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your review. Tac91 (talk) 16:55, 30 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tac91! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wikishovel (talk) 08:05, 28 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]