User talk:Table92
December 2019
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Table92 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am User talk:Beaneater00. After submitting an unblock request, my talk page access was revoked. I created another account so that I could continue to contribute to Wikipedia as it was no longer possible to appeal my other account's block. I have valid reasons for wanting an appeal; see the contributions of both accounts as well as my arguments on the Beaneater00 talk page. Is there any way in which I can redeem myself and resume contributing to Wikipedia? I don't mind having to wait a long time. Table92 (complain about my vandalisms) 01:23, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Sock puppeting is definitely not the way to do it. Your block was for the reasons described at User_talk:Beaneater00. By the way it's at least three accounts, you didn't mention User:Basileus kai Autokrator Reginald. WP:SO suggests waiting 6 months without further attempts to evade your block, and then submitting an unblock request via UTRS. See WP:GAB. ST47 (talk) 01:52, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
ST47, I would like another chance to edit Wikipedia. I have actively persisted for over a week in attempting to appeal my blocks. When I created this account, I immediately began actively editing Wikipedia in a constructive manner, making significant contributions to the Lykov family article. I have made mistakes in the past and violated the rules, it is true, but I would like to be allowed another chance - before I was permanently blocked on the Beaneater00 account, I received no formal warnings or temporary blocks. I would at least like my block to be made finite. It is easier to unblock me and see what the results will be than to continue debating in this way[1][2] Table92 (talk) 02:43, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- I don't agree, and please note that since your main account is currently blocked with talk page access disabled, you are currently evading that block. You should submit a request via UTRS using your original account once you have met the requirements at WP:SO. ST47 (talk) 03:12, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, I've revoked talk page access. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 04:30, 21 December 2019 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~TNT (she/they • talk) 18:55, 10 August 2021 (UTC)