User talk:TaaniOk/Archive 1

February 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Montenegro attempted coup. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. This seems like a single purpose account. Ethanbas ^(talk) 18:52, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TaaniOk reported by User:Ethanbas (Result: ). Thank you. Ethanbas ^(talk) 21:48, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You aren't following proper editing guidelines. You should start discussions when you make controversial edits and see if others agree on them; don't just revert and blank what others have done without reaching consensus first. Cheers. Ethanbas ^(talk) 21:51, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What? Talk: 2015-16 Montenegrin crisis. You aren't following proper editing guidelines. You should start discussions when you make controversial edits and see if others agree on them; don't just revert and blank what others have done without reaching consensus first. Cheers. TaaniOk (talk) 21:55, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Are you some ridiculous Russian AI joke? Please... Ethanbas ^(talk) 22:00, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Civility TaaniOk (talk) 22:02, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia. You need to stop page blanking and seek an AfD; if you don't, you will probably get blocked soon. Ethanbas ^(talk) 22:12, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Ethanbas.TaaniOk (talk) 00:11, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Beeblebrox (talk) 00:14, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Beeblebrox. Incidents ([1], [2] - Wikipedia:Civility: Incivility and or a threat against another person; [3], [4], [5] - Wikipedia:Civility: trolling, incivility; [6], [7] - Wikipedia:Civility: Incivility "Vandal", "doesn't speak English", "Possible paid Russian propagandist") it is сivility, ethical behavior in English Wikipedia? TaaniOk (talk) 08:50, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You were both blocked for edit warring, which you were both doing. I've let Ethanbas know that their other behaviors were also not acceptable. If they keep it up after the block expires, I would expect that they would be blocked again, probably for much longer. Please follow WP:BRD in the future, even if other users do not. Edit warring is always the wrong thing to do. Beeblebrox (talk) 11:13, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]