User talk:Jack Shukla

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Welcome!

Hello, TKSS, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic

The article Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NOTFILM.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. O Fortuna!^{...Imperatrix mundi.} 13:22, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing for Beginners

Hi there, so re: this edit and similar ones like this and this, it appears you might benefit from some help with reference formatting, as I notice some issues with some of your references: We're missing a space between the URL and the article title, in many cases the article titles are not properly capitalised, they shouldn't be italicised, and the phrasing "An article from Indian Express" or "An article from TOI" is non-standard. You might benefit from taking a look at Referencing for Beginners. The simplest way, in my opinion, to deal with references, is a two step approach:

Slap bare URLs into ref tags like this: <ref>http://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/bollywood/dia-mirza-to-play-manyata-in-sanjay-dutt-bipoic-4485399</ref>. Save the page.
Then access the tool reFill, paste the article title into the appropriate field, and reFill will fill out most references automatically. The tool doesn't work 100% of the time, so you may have to still format manually.

Alternatively, if you need a more hands-on approach to referencing, built into the edit window is a very useful citation tool. To cite a website, you would need to click on "Cite > Templates > Cite web" and this will bring up a window with a variety of fill-in boxes. The accompanying picture should make it easy to visualise. This is the second-easiest way to add references, in my opinion. I've done this in these edits and the result is a much cleaner set of references. Regards, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 13:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok i understand Cyphoidbomb please tell Shimlaites that he shouldn't write anything in hindi on the infobox. This english encyclopedia. If he want's to write hindi in the infobox on the bollywood film articles then he should go to wikipedia hindi. Please tell him this and tell him that stop reverting my edits on Dutt (film) article. Regards, TKSS (talk) 06:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you have an issue with Shimlaites, you should speak to them directly. This is a collaborative project and discussion is important. As to your point about the Hindi, if a film is released with Hindi script in the title, it's not unreasonable to include the Indic script in the infobox. For example, Drishyam was marketed largely with Malayalam script on its posters, so having the native Malayalam name in the infobox should be relatively uncontroversial. It's helpful for readers and other editors to have access to this script so they can perform their own research, such as looking for references. If a film is generally marketed using Romanised script or in English, as is often the case in Hindi films, then no, we probably shouldn't include the Hindi script in those cases. PK is best delivered as "PK", without the Hindi script. Same with Airlift, Ghayal Once Again, Baaghi, etc. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 14:43, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, as I look closer at the events that transpired, TKSS, I see that you reverted Shimlaites three times without explanation here, here and here. What do you expect another editor to do when you silently revert their edits? The smart approach would have been to revert with a clear edit summary, then to drop Shimlaites a note on his talk page or on the article talk page to explain your objection. This whole thing could have been avoided with clear, friendly discussion. It would be appreciated if you'd please endeavor to do things differently the next time, because we simply can't run a collaborative project this way. Thank you. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Untitled Sanjay Dutt biopic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User TKSS

I was patrolling the new user logs, and saw that this user was just created and redirected their user and user talk pages to yours. Just wanted to notify you in case this isn't you; I'm hoping this user isn't trying to impersonate or troll ;-)... let me know. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:21, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm an idiot... the user redirection here was performed by this account. Disregard my stupidity and carry on... lol :-D ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:22, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am just redirecting my old usernames because of security reasons. Regards, Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 07:26, 8 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The sock you reported

I want to let you know that I think I have got hold of the sock here [1] you reported a few days back. He is far more consistent than we can even think. Your contribution in this regard is also required as I want to nail him for once and all.-Umair Aj (talk) 10:09, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok brother sorry for the late reply was busy with my personal life . I will surely help you but please tell me what all kind of proofs you need to identify him/her as a sock. Regards Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 18:23, 14 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

My regards to you brother. At the moment there is no need to take any action as I have already got him and the sock is blocked for a weeek but I must appreciate your efforts against him. In my opinion he is still running some socks so please keep an eye and notify me also if sock emerges again.-Umair Aj (talk) 18:22, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok brother will try to keep an eye on the other socks of DHSULP.Regards Jack Shukla AKA TKSS & Paplesh. (talk) 08:53, 23 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Jack Shukla. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. GMG ^talk 10:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sanju's film poster.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sanju's film poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:36, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic. Since you had some involvement with the Untitled Sanjay Dutt Biopic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. --wooden superman 10:27, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jack Shukla. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing editors of writing manipulated paid content

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Sushant Singh Rajput. Thank you. NedFausa (talk) 18:49, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]