User talk:TJ Reilly

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Detroit Tigers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. TomCat4680 (talk) 04:06, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rumours

Please don't add rumours, no matter how likely, to articles unless they're clearly cited as such. -- Zanimum (talk) 12:00, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox highlights

You might not have been aware, but Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice lists highlights that are generally included in a bio's infobox. Feel free to get a new consesus at WT:BASEBALL if you have any concerns. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 04:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

In case you missed it All-Star MVP was not on the list.[1]—Bagumba (talk) 05:10, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ASG MVP

Robbie Cano had his on so I just started doing others and it makes no sense to have ALCS/NLCS and not All-Star Game that's a huge accomplishment that fans should see when they're on the players page. I'm not trying to break rules or anything, but that just seems a bit weird. TJ Reilly (talk) 05:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. Like I said, you probably didn't know about past convention. Nobody likes seeing their work get undone, which is why I suggested discussing this at WT:BASEBALL to see if people are OK before you invest more time on it.—Bagumba (talk) 05:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I had noticed that you were adding Lou Gehrig Memorial Award, which someone else was reverting, so wanted to make sure you were aware about the conflict.—Bagumba (talk) 05:19, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah it's all good.

Cycle

Please stop adding hitting for the cycle in the infobox per Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Player style advice.--Yankees10 00:13, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Jack Morris, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Tigers announced that Morris and Trammell's numbers would be retired. Do you think you could edit it for me? I don't know how lol

I'd rather teach you how to fish than give you a fish. The first step is to find a reliable source saying that their numbers will be retired. Then, add your text with the reference directly after it, using the "ref" html tags around the reference. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:22, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trammell and Morris will have their numbers retired in 2018, but it hasn't happened yet. – Muboshgu (talk) 20:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Detroit Red Wings (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Harry Watson, Harry Lumley, George Hay, Jack Stewart, Larry Murphy and Doug Harvey

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

June 2018

Hello, I'm Yosemiter. I noticed that you made one or more changes to an article, Buffalo Sabres, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 23:15, 23 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Buffalo Sabres, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Yosemiter (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to their Conference Championships, from 1974 to 1981 the Prince of Wales Trophy was awarded to the Wales Conference regular season winner as the playoffs were interconference. The top 16 teams qualified and were seeded 1–16, hence no playoff conference champion could be awarded. That would mean even their 1975 Conf. Title was awarded that way as well (as they moved on to the Stanley Cup finals by defeating Montreal in the semis, and both teams had defeated a team that was in the opposite conf furing the quarters, CHI and VAN respectively). Thank you, Yosemiter (talk) 00:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page J. A. Happ appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:06, 26 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

August 2018

Please do not add or change content, as you did at José Bautista, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you not listen? – Muboshgu (talk) 01:22, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The trades

I only do these edits when they are done deals from the man Ken Rosenthal himself once they are announced. Am I ever wrong or premature with them? No.

TJ Reilly (talk) 02:24, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If Rosenthal cites unnamed sources, WP:RSBREAKING applies. Making the trade look like it has completed when it was only reported is WP:OR. Regards.—Bagumba (talk) 04:49, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, TJ Reilly. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Muboshgu. Your recent edit to the page Andrew McCutchen appears to have added premature information about a reported sports transaction, so it has been removed for now. The transaction is based on anonymous sources and/or awaiting an official announcement. If you believe the transaction has been completed, please cite a reliable source or discuss your change on the article's talk page. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:56, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'll keep reverting your edits and using this talk page template every single time you make unsourced changes like the one you just did. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:57, 11 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]