Jump to content

User talk:TIF Commentator

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, TIF Commentator! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! --Jza84 |  Talk  23:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Edit summaries

[edit]

Hello. Please use an edit summary for every edit you make to Wikipedia, particularly on contentious articles such as the Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund (TiF). The edit summary field should be used to let the community know what changes you are making and why, not for direct communication with a single editor. Thank you, --Jza84 |  Talk  16:25, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

November 2008

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Greater Manchester Transport Innovation Fund (TiF) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. JodyB talk 21:42, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Manchester TiF

[edit]

Hi there. Thanks for your contribution to this article, however if you are going to insert material for referencing can you please adhere to the same standards as other references within the article? If you're unsure how to do this please drop me a line, but its fairly simple stuff and helps keep the article to a reasonable technical standard. Parrot of Doom (talk) 18:03, 1 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Can I ask you again - PLEASE FORMAT YOUR REFERENCES CORRECTLY? Parrot of Doom (talk) 18:53, 4 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

References

[edit]

It's good to see you adding sources to articles when you add material, but it is important to format your sources. The best way to do this is with Template:Citation. The benefits are that it neatly formats the reference and provides fields for information to be included. The minimum required information are the title, publisher, and accessdate, but the other fields are very helpful. The idea is that if the link ever goes dead, someone reading the article may still be able to find the relevant information. Here's an example of how it works :{{citation |url=http://content-uk.cricinfo.com/england/content/story/133792.html |author=Emma John |title=Lessons in life |publisher=Cricinfo.com |date=19 September 2003 |accessdate=3 March 2008}} gives "Emma John (19 September 2003), Lessons in life, Cricinfo.com, retrieved 3 March 2008". The "date=" field is for the date the work was made, I hope everything else is self explanatory.

Then, if you put that template between <ref> and </ref>, the sources will appear in the reference sections you see in articles with all the other references. If anything's unclear, please ask and happy editing. Nev1 (talk) 01:25, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]