User talk:THE BIGGEST KING

August 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pun have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pun was changed by THE BIGGEST KING (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953357 on 2022-08-18T21:28:44+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:28, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Pun. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mustermaster (talk) 21:51, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

My edits are not vandalism sir other people are removing them and vandalising me THE BIGGEST KING (talk) 23:43, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pun, you may be blocked from editing. RteeeeKed 💬📖 23:44, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

How am I vandalising? I add useful information to the article then other people delete it! Please please look at the article history and you will see that I am being vandalised. THE BIGGEST KING (talk) 23:45, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pun. RteeeeKed 💬📖 23:47, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I am not vandalising other people are deleting my edits can Wikipedia staff please look into this and help me? I don’t know what is making people attack me THE BIGGEST KING (talk) 23:48, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

THE BIGGEST KING (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here I am a new editor and I whenever I try to add information to the page other users vandalise it and now I am being accused of vandalising! @wikipedia employees I have been blocked by mistake please unblock me and block vandals instead! THE BIGGEST KING (talk) 8:06 pm, Today (UTC−4)

Decline reason:

I'm afraid you are not being vandalized. Your edits are unconstructive and rightly reverted. Until you can understand that, you cannot be unblocked. As to being new, we were all new once. You'd be surprised how many new editors do not get blocked and do net reject or ignore warnings and feedback as you have done.-- Deepfriedokra (talk) 01:34, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

THE BIGGEST KING (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I don’t understand what is wrong. I added a section on treehouse to complain and it got vandalised as well. I work for a national; how do you think Wikipedia owners and advertisers will feel about the way I am being treated! I don’t like the way Wikipedia staff are punishing me for being vandalised and the vandals are deleting content which is just like what other people have added but it isn’t deleted. THE BIGGEST KING (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed to blocked vandal, JohnBravely1991. Yamla (talk) 16:28, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sockpuppetry

Please note that I have just blocked THE BIGGEST KING 2 (talk · contribs) as a sockpuppet and advised them to appeal their block from this account. DanCherek (talk) 16:06, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]