User talk:TGcoa

Your article Germanwings Eitilt 9525

Welcome, and thank you for contributing the page Germanwings Eitilt 9525 to Wikipedia. While you have added the page to the English version of Wikipedia, the article is not in English. We invite you to translate it into English. It has been listed at Pages Needing Translation, but if it is not translated within two weeks, the article will be listed for deletion. Thank you. Stikkyy (talk) (contributions) 23:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sorare for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sorare is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorare until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

^Hidden_Lemon _/^{/ talk} 23:13, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia

Thanks for identifying the source of the material in your edit.

This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.

I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that you need to be crossed.S Philbrick (Talk) 11:21, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Cathal Ó Searcaigh controversy

Hi, I understand your wish to highlight the episode 15 years ago when the whole of the chattering classes in Ireland had an opinion. Now however the controversy has faded and it overbalances the narrative to make too much of it -- after all, extensive investigation led to no charges and the argument centred on conflicting opinion, not fact. I had previously considered removing the Dermod Moore interview, and discussed it with colleagues but the discussion ran into the sand. Now I have to admit, and agree, that if a negative reference is not included, neither should a positive one -- it's better to leave out both. I hope you appreciate the reasoning. The mention of charity work in Nepal has been removed too -- although factual, there's no quotable citation to confirm it.

I've done the same in the Vicipéid article. I know you had some other edits there; they seemed trivial compared with the Kathmandu issue, e.g. 'duine' for 'scríbhneoir' etc, but if you feel strongly about these then I wouldn't oppose them being reinstated. Dmhball~enwiki (talk) 23:03, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfD discussion for December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions

Hello, just wanted to let you know that voting to keep or delete the article cannot be done on the talk page. The article for deletion discussion is happening here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/December 15, 2022 Twitter suspensions

Cheers! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:11, 19 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:46, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]