User talk:TE(æ)A,ea.

Welcome!

Hello, TE(æ)A,ea., and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Moonraker (talk) 23:59, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your editing at Wikisource

Hello, TE(æ)A,ea.. You have new messages at DonQuixote's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hidden Springs, Idaho

I have reverted your page move but can you please explain why you moved it to Hidden Spring, Idaho when all the sources I can find, including their own website, call it "Hidden Springs"? CUPIDICAE💕 13:16, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you..

.. for your revert at Wikipedia:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man. I have warned the trolling user. Bishonen | tålk 17:12, 6 September 2021 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replying to someone

Hi TE(æ)A,ea -- when replying to someone, please use colons to properly nest your reply under their comment; do not post flush-left. Please avoid copying the user's signature; only the user themselves uses that. If you want to ping them, use the WP:PING codes, like this: {{U|Name}} To ping me here, you would type {{U|Softlavender}} and it would show up Softlavender. Thank you, Softlavender (talk) 02:20, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Adding: To ping-reply to the editor you are conversing with at the current AFD, type this: {{U|Vivin}} , and make sure you nest your reply correctly under theirs using the right number of colons. Check before posting by using the "Show preview" option. Thank you, Softlavender (talk) 02:30, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Tayi Arajakate _Talk 20:45, 1 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Mass killings under communist regimes (4th nomination). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. jp×g 02:33, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Much of the language about Trump's "baseless" and "conspiracist" claims in the Mar-a-Lago FBI Search article is actually supported by the sources

If you wish to challenge this language, please go through item by item and checkout the individual sources. This has already been discussed briefly on the article talk page. Thank you! 98.155.8.5 (talk) 23:43, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like many of the other editors also agree, that if you would like to challenge specific potentially problematic wording or phrases on the FBI search of Mar-a-Lago article, to please do so one at a time (not in a wholesale fashion) and allow some discussion to happen on the talk page for each issue raised. This is how we build WP:Consensus. Looking forward to your proposals! Cheers. 98.155.8.5 (talk) 01:02, 28 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Accessdates

WP:ACCESSDATE: The full date when the content pointed to by url was last verified to support the text in the article; do not wikilink; requires url; use the same format as other access and archive dates in the article's citations. It is not required for linked documents that do not change. For example, access-date is not required for links to copies of published research papers accessed via DOI or a published book, but should be used for links to news articles on commercial websites (these can change from time to time, even if they are also published in a physical medium). Note that access-date is the date that the URL was checked to not just be working, but to support the assertion being cited (which the current version of the page may not do). Can be hidden or styled by registered editors. Alias: accessdate. URLs do change. It is only not required for DOIs and books. – Muboshgu (talk) 21:21, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Secondary journalistic sources are important!

Don't understand why you keep trying to remove the NYT source. Totally unnecessary to do so! What's going on? Thanks. 98.155.8.5 (talk) 03:53, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Andre🚐 17:19, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Andre🚐 17:28, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing FBI search of Mar-a-Lago for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Daniel Case (talk) 20:04, 31 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Removing access-dates

hello, I noticed you are currently edit warring to remove access-dates [1] please do not do this. Andre🚐 22:13, 25 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:52, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting Vandalism

'sup. Several followers of the VTuber "Selen Tatsuki" try to deface the company "Nijisanji" because they fired her. https://twitter.com/NIJISANJI_World/status/1754459182412222481 You can request the raise in the protection level: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_page_protection/Increase I created a request, but it doesn't show up, perhaps because I don't have an account. Anyway have a nice day. 2A00:9FE0:1:13:0:0:0:47E (talk) 20:41, 5 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WP:3RR violation on Sweet Baby Inc.

This is a 3RR violation, I think (reverting this); previous reverts were [2][3][4] - and probably others, but those were clear-cut. You should self-revert your most recent edit. --Aquillion (talk) 01:28, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:TE(æ)A,ea. reported by User:Aquillion (Result: ). Thank you. Aquillion (talk) 01:54, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute_resolution_noticeboard regarding state of Sweet Baby Inc. article. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. The thread is "Sweet Baby Inc.".The discussion is about the topic Sweet Baby Inc..

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

--Moon darker (talk) 03:37, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template. Note: This notification was triggered due to your recent edits to Sweet Baby Inc.

⇒SWATJester ^{Shoot Blues, Tell VileRat!} 07:13, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Assassination

Please do not readd unverified categories. We do not know for sure that he was targeted. We all expect that he was, but we need WP:V. – Muboshgu (talk) 00:15, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That AP source that follow the sentence you changed is interesting. The first line is Donald Trump appeared to be the target of an assassination attempt, emphasis mine, and then later says it was one in the Reagan sentence. This appears to be an issue of WP:BREAKING where the AP was not as careful as it should have been. Please stop calling it an "assassination attempt" until media unequivocally calls it an assassination attempt, which is not yet the case. – Muboshgu (talk) 01:27, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong and improper vandalism accusations

You reverted my last two edits and claimed vandalism. This is factually wrong. Just by reading the summary I wrote on each you'd know that.Given you are not acting in good faith I am formally asking you to refrain from editing my comments or edits or from posting on my TP.

Feel free to delete this notice when you read it. 73.123.180.173 (talk) 23:00, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]