User talk:TANUJ94

July 2014

Hello, I'm LeoFrank. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — LeoFrank ^Talk 08:57, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. — LeoFrank ^Talk 08:58, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. — LeoFrank ^Talk 09:23, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. — LeoFrank ^Talk 09:41, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not synthesize content from a source. Also do not add cr inside the template as you did here. The standard parameter for crore is c, see {{INR convert}}. — LeoFrank ^Talk 12:32, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty was changed by TANUJ94 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892504 on 2014-07-03T09:06:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:06, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:57, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. — LeoFrank ^Talk 07:54, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty has been reverted.
Your edit here to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/overseas) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:41, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty

Careful! What you are adding are total earnings, not just the four weeks. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 09:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Villain may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{film

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:17, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Villain may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:35, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Villain may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox film
105.62|c}}at the box office. <ref name="http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers">{{cite web|title=http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:19, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox film
112.45|c}}at the box office. <ref name="http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers">{{cite web|title=http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:27, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{Infobox film
112.45|c}}at the box office. <ref name="http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers">{{cite web|title=http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers}</ref>

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:30, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Rameshnta909. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Ek Villain because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Rameshnta909 (talk) 14:57, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Ek Villain may have broken the syntax by modifying 3 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

The film collected{INRConvert|105.62|c}}in India. <ref name="http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/box-office/top-grossers">{{cite web|title=http:
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ek Villain, you may be blocked from editing. Rameshnta909 (talk) 16:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 7 days for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. PhilKnight (talk) 18:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Holiday: A Soldier Is Never Off Duty may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:29, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:50, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:36, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:32, 28 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:31, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary with every edit. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, even if it is very brief, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history.

The edit summary appears in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Param Mudgal (talk) 07:23, 29 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 05:53, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:54, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:59, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:56, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:35, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raja Natwarlal may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:43, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:01, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:27, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:49, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raja Natwarlal may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:59, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:02, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Raja Natwarlal may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:16, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:22, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mardaani may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:15, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Singham Returns may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

}}
}}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A note about references

If a reference is named and has full citation details once in the article, you don't need to copy the full details to use that reference again as you've did here and have done repeatedly before. All you need to do for the subsequent times you use that reference is just type <ref name="r1" />. You are also often copying the closing braces of the infobox template which ends up displaying on the article and triggers the bracket bot warning. Please take a few moments to preview your edits and fix the problems you are causing.

Finally, the gross parameter in the infobox template is the worldwide gross of the film. Please stop changing it to just a single country's gross. Ravensfire (talk) 13:50, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Mardaani, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Your edits are reverting duplicate references and leaving unmatched brackets. You have been told this before. Stop. Ravensfire (talk) 08:09, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Mardaani, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ravensfire (talk) 16:09, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mary Kom (film), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Chander For You 13:56, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Singham Returns. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please stop duplicating references and breaking the markup as you've been doing. Such edits will be reverted. Update the information, but stop causing problems with the markup, ignoring warning and disregarding comments from others. Ravensfire (talk) 14:21, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 21:36, 8 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]