User talk:TAKEN00

If you leave messages here, please expect a response from me over here.
If I've left a message on your talkpage, and I'm slow to respond to a reply made there, please let me know.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 22:56, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I read about it but I forgot to do it sorry :P. The thing is that I don't get the meaning of the signature since it tells that it's me anyways.

>>>>>>>>>>> TAKEN00 (talk) 02:45, 18 December 2007 (UTC) ;)[reply]

lol so you are a bot TAKEN00 (talk) 02:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MCB

Hi TAKEN00, thanks for your recent contributions. I thought I should drop you a {{welcome}} (by clicking the link you will get some standard advice dispensed to all new contributors).

From your edits I detect an interest in things molecular biological. Could I invite you to WikiProject Molecular and Cellular Biology? There's some pretty amazing work going on, and your help is more than simply welcome. JFW | T@lk 22:59, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! Thanks for the links, they are very helpful! TAKEN00 (talk) 02:43, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to MCB

Hi there, welcome to the Wikiproject. If you had any questions, ideas or suggestions please drop me a note on my talk page. All the best Tim Vickers (talk) 18:15, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Redundancy

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Gene Redundancy, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.wrongdiagnosis.com/medical/gene_redundancy.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:39, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Gene Redundancy

A tag has been placed on Gene Redundancy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. LAA Fan 14:06, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rat embryonic fibroblasts ref

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rat embryonic fibroblasts ref, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Redenduntant to Fibroblast and not a viable redirect due to the "ref" in end of the title

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Lenticel ^(talk) 04:06, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]