User talk:T2gurut2

License tagging for File:MF of general T2 FS.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:MF of general T2 FS.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Type-2 fuzzy sets and systems, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable fuzzy modification of the concept of fuzzy sets. I expect this to be reverted, but I'm not ready to put together the full list of reasons for deletion and options.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 15:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction

"A fuzzy set Fuzzy_sets is comprised of elements that reside in it to a degree of belonging that can be any number from 0 to 1. It is this property that distinguishes it from a crisp set, for which a member is either in the set or is not."

The sentences above need to be tightened up. First, "is comprised of" is a mistake a lot of writers make when they try to use the various forms of "comprise". Here, "is comprised of" should be replaced with "is composed of" or "comprises". Never use "is comprised of"; it makes no sense. Second, "elements that reside in it to a degree of belonging that can be any number from 0 to 1" is illogical, because if an element has a 0 degree of belonging, then it doesn't reside in the set. Otherwise, you run into the absurdity of all possible elements "residing in" all possible sets. You should remove "reside" and just talk about belonging. Third, "for which a member is either in the set or is not" is not sufficient to distinguish crisp sets from non-crisp sets, because "in the set" is the same kind of thing as "reside". In other words, even with non-crisp sets, an element is either "in the set" (with a non-0 degree of belonging) or "not in the set" (with a 0 degree of belonging). What distinguishes crisp sets is that they restrict the values of "belonging" to the extremes of 0 and 1. 108.185.45.70 (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]