User talk:T0rek

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello T0rek! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy Editing! -- Kukini 06:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

Lilith

When you edit the Popular Culture section of this article, it explicitly says:
NOTICE: These examples are based in some way on the mythological character discussed above; examples where just the name was borrowed without direct relevance to the myth should be placed on the Disambiguation page. Do not add characters that are simply named Lilith. Examples of Lilith-based stuff that doesn't belong here includes Neon Genesis Evangelion, DarkStalkers and Diablo. Thank you.
Your changes have been reverted. Regards, Danny Lilithborne 05:42, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bank raid

My race has nothing to do with me removing the section. Wikipedia is not a place for "breaking news", the section was also unsourced. I would've deleted it no matter what country those people who were involved with came from. So please refrain from re-adding the section, it is irrelevant to the article. LaNicoya •TALK• 09:18, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What wikipedia is not states: "5. Journalism. Wikipedia should not offer first-hand news reports on breaking stories. Wikipedia is not a primary source. However, our sister project Wikinews does exactly that, and is intended to be a primary source." LaNicoya •TALK• 09:22, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:

If that is the case, feel free to change the information and correct it. I wrote what i found in the sources. If you find something is wrong, correct it, that is what editors do on Wikipedia right? Don't forget to source the information you post. I'll translate the Spanish article [1] for the "Partido de Nicoya" and find more information and sources for it if possible. Maybe you can hold off changing anything on the Guanacaste article until i finish the Partido de Nicoya so it can be wikilinked, what do you say? LaNicoya •TALK• 07:30, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. It doesn't matter if the sources are in Spanish, i know this is English Wikipedia but our countries are in Latin America, most of out information available online is in Spanish. If you have a source, use it. Nothing in the Wikipedia guidelines says anything about not being able to use a source if it is not in English. LaNicoya •TALK• 07:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Message on my talk page

As a general rule please may I recommend you leave messages about articles on the article talk page (where I think the deletion of schools lists was already discussed) and just leave a courtesy note on user talk pages drawing their attention to it? Otherwise you might accidentally give the impression that you are lecturing people on policies which they know (I've been the reviewing admin on a lot of speedy-ds), which would be a shame. I don't remember much about that particular case. Thanks--BozMo talk 10:09, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]