User talk:T. Baphomet/Archive 1

Minor edits

Hi; I happened across some edits of yours that you incorrectly marked as minor edits. Please don't do this; edits can be marked as minor for the purpose of separating "housekeeping" edits (spelling, grammar) from edits over which there might be dispute. Reverting content because you don't think it belongs in an article is not a minor edit. -- Antaeus Feldspar 16:05, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't realize. Thank you. Paul Stone 19:03, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gnostic Movement

I have some overall concerns about this article. Primarily the notablity of the subject matter. There are very few links from other sites to the external references, and often the primary links are only to each other. I am eliciting comments since you have edited on this page. See my comments on the talk page. Trödel 23:00, 13 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just wanted to make sure that you noticed that this page was nominated for deletion yesterday. Although I think your points are well made, I voted delete because since I brought my concerns up on the talk page - the constant barrage of edits support my view that it is not verifiable because the references are self published and uncollaborated. I also want to thank you for all the hard work you have done on the article to try to keep it neutral. --Trödel 13:39, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I saw that and commented on the first AfD, stating that although I did look for sources, I do not think the article can get out of WP:OR, because enough 3rd party sources do not exist. If the article is deleted, perhaps it is for the best. --Paul Stone 14:03, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]