User talk:Sysilverstein

May 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Cheeseburger, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 21:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Cheeseburgers

Perhaps Sternberger did invent - is not a neutral sentence, it implies an opinion on the matter. Secondly, your citing of a scanned document from a library does not work, as it is original research. I suggest you also read up on our other core policy, neutral point of view. Lastly, you are not allowed to write with undue weight given a particular subject of the article, again, as also per WP:NPOV.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 23:22, 18 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Myer

He can have been both. That statement is nonsensical. It's like saying "I'm not American, I'm six feet tall." Also, pls point me to a page. I don't see it.--Epeefleche (talk) 08:16, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I did "point" you to a page: the passage is footnoted with a precise citation. The quotation extract was accurate and contextual; here is the full (if convoluted) quotation from Bill James: "Actually, Myer may not have been Jewish. He told a home-town newspaperman shortly before his death in 1974 that he was not Jewish, he was German, but that the writers thought that he was Jewish, and he just didn't think that being German was anything to be proud of at the time, so he never set the record straight." (New Bill James Historical Baseball Abstract - 2001 - p 499) Sysilverstein (talk) 15:03, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. That is helpful, in that it clarifies that what I view as the nonsensical part is part of the attribution. I also now see that in the preceding para at 498-99 [1] he quotes Ribalow's referense to Myer as Jewish. And Megdal in the recently published Baseball Talmud includes him, and separately when asked to comments on that said "Basically, to excise Myer from the book, I have this anecdote, against a whole life lived as a self-identifying Jew. I went with the preponderance of the evidence." See [2]. Or, as another commentator said, "who would anybody [in anti-semitic baseball] pretend to be Jewish?" Finally, a quick google search of "mayer german jewish" will yield a number of German Jews named Myer ... see [3]; his comment as reported in confusing.--Epeefleche (talk) 00:21, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nonetheless, I edited the entry to remove any ambiguity. Best regards. Sysilverstein (talk) 00:56, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to wikiFeed

Hello Sysilverstein,

I'm part of a team that is researching ways to help Wikipedia editors find interesting content to contribute to Wikipedia. More specifically, we are investigating whether content from news sources can be used to enhance Wikipedia editing. We have created a tool, called wikiFeed, that allows you to specify Twitter and/or RSS feeds from news sources that are interesting to you. wikiFeed then helps you make connections between those feeds and Wikipedia articles. We believe that using this tool may be a lot of fun, and may help you come up with some ideas on how to contribute to Wikipedia in ways that interest you. Please participate! To do so, complete this survey and follow this link to our website. Once you're there, click the "create an account" link to get started.

For more information about wikiFeed, visit our project page. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask via my talk page, or by email at wikifeedcc@gmail.com. We appreciate your time and hope you enjoy playing with wikiFeed!

Thanks! Jeremey Bentham (talk) 21:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Sysilverstein. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Sysilverstein. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Sysilverstein. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]