User talk:SymICiEl

This is SymICiEl's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research on synchronicty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Research on synchronicty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SymICiEl! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:49, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Sulfurboy were:

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research on synchronicty and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Research on synchronicty, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 04:55, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://coincider.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/18-Beitman-Chap18.pdf, http://cambridgecoincidences.org/,. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure. Note to reviewers: do not leave copyright violations sitting in the page history. Please follow the instructions here.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Research on synchronicty may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 11:37, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove a speedy deletion notice from a page you have created yourself. I have already explained to you how copyright works on IRC and on the talk page. Do not remove the tags again. Praxidicae (talk) 19:53, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your deletion notice does not make sense for the reasons you stated. There are no sections of the article that are not referenced properly or plagiarized.

You cannot copy content from elsewhere even if you cite it as wikipedia has a specific licensing that allows copying itself. You copied content from the links I gave on the talk page. That is not allowed. Praxidicae (talk) 19:59, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide in quotations the copied material which you speak of. The survey items that were not in quotations are now shown in quotations and cannot be changed or else they change the meaning of the summary research.

click the links, read them. I'm not going to recopy copyrighted material. It's not just "survey items." Do your own research. Praxidicae (talk) 20:02, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are not properly backing up your claim then that there are words on the page that are not properly copied from the sources you have listed. It is your claim that there is plagiarized material on the page which I dispute as I have checked the sources.

Plagiarism and WP:COPYRIGHT are not the same. Read it for yourself. Praxidicae (talk) 20:11, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Research is allowed to be cited for educational purposes. Copyright protects against others using for monetary gain. Citing survey research is not copyright infringement.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicty (March 11)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

Sulfurboy (talk) 21:54, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

POV forks

Hello SymICiEl. I noticed that your draft was deleted as a copyright infringement, which Wikipedia takes very seriously. There however are other problems: please note for instance that in the example you cited, meditation has a Research section. To prevent that section from being too large, because there was significant material, research on meditation is a subarticle that is linked at that section. When edits are contested at the main synchronicity article, we cannot add them to a seperate subarticle, resulting in a WP:POVFORK. You should instead seek WP:CONSENSUS for your changes at Talk:Synchronicity and expand that article first. I hope this helps, —Paleo Neonate – 03:48, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Important message

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in pseudoscience and fringe science. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—Paleo Neonate – 03:49, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research on synchronicity (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RoySmith was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Synchronicity instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Research on synchronicity and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Research on synchronicity, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- RoySmith (talk) 22:39, 21 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Research on synchronicity has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Research on synchronicity. Thanks! ~Kvng (talk) 23:03, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Research on synchronicity

Hello, SymICiEl. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Research on synchronicity".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:52, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]