User talk:Sybrexx

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

Note: Article to follow with logo inclusion, article still under editing

Orphaned non-free media (File:Insurance_Technologies_Organization_Logo.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Insurance_Technologies_Organization_Logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 07:41, 30 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spamming Horrornews.net

Please stop spamming articles with Horrornews.net as an external link or source of reviews/critical reception, as you have done twice to American Horror Story([1], [2]), twice to Friday the 13th (1980 film) ([3][4], and other pages: [5],[6]. This blog is far from a reliable source. See the WP:TVRECEPTION section of the Manual of Style for more information on appropriate sources for critical reception, as well as WP:ELNO and WP:ADV for guidelines on inappropriate external links. In addition, since you keep linking to this obscure website, please be aware that if you are in any way affiliated with Horrornews.net, you might have a conflict of interest and/or be seen as promoting this website. If so, you should avoid adding these links altogether or you might be banned/blocked. Thank you. --Logical Fuzz (talk) 01:27, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Response to Spamming Horrornews.net

Authors note: (Sybrexx) Please note that this is a website I admire and think should be included in horror genre relevant articles. As far as the obscure, they are anything "but" with rankings competing with amazon, IMDB and even your own wikipedia. while that might not be a concern to wiki, it may be worth at least paying attention to. Number one listing in all searches for "Horror news"..etc (per investigation and their bio) you might query searches to learn that in many cases the site is beating Wikipedia in rankings or at least within the same page Ex: review the henry portrait of a serial killer, review the prescence, review alyce, Review Cut Throats Nine......

Additional Notes: Often, wiki uses alot of the same site references in regards to film review references. While sites like Rotten tomatoes (and related) might be known review sites, they are also non specific to genres. Actually unfairly promoting them as a general site rather than a more specific genre site. IMDB another case, where random users can enter in reviews "without background" and list within Wiki as a trusted source.

Wiki uses the term "blog" as almost in a condescending way, but in fact the entire internet is "almost" all built on blogs. Rather they are databases period. IMDB, amazon, TMZ all databases which began in blog format and grew.

I emailed them (HorrorNewsnet) to have an outside source write their wiki page, so that their is no affiliated conflict. As writing it myself seems like it would just get deleted regardless

Note: I apologize if I'm responding in the correct format, I'm still learning Wiki Sybrexx (talk) 20:35, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Insurance Technologies Organization Logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Insurance Technologies Organization Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:59, 4 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]