User talk:Swwright

Wikipedia

This is a Wikipedia user page.
If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated, and that the user to whom this page belongs may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Swwright.

Wikimedia Foundation

Hello Swwright!

thanks for your message. It's good to know that someone is reading my edits! Anyway, I'm no great expert on quantum tictactoe; my entire knowledge of it comes from reading an excellent article in American Journal of Physics a few months back.

I'd say that you would be better informed than me about the game...so be bold and edit my pitiful stub as you see fit! This way, we all benefit.

Enjoy, Robinh 17:45, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hello, Swwright, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at the help desk, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up, probably in less than 15 minutes, to answer your questions. Again, welcome! | AndonicO ^{Talk | Sign Here} 01:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

.

Quote

Hi Swwright! Thanks for clarifiying who had said "Fear only fear itself". I'm guessing it was a proverb before that, but his speech probably made it famous. Thanks again! | AndonicO ^{Talk · Sign Here} 11:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

svg/png bohr model

I replied to the SVG/PNG issue on my talk page. 23:13, 12 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dzién dobry

Jak się masz?

Just a warning - I am not fluent in Polish -I was born in the US and my parents didn;t speak much either. I can speak a little and write even less. My best friend is Polish (from Stalowa Wola, among other places).

Just got your message; just specify what you don't like about the Kirby page and we can discuss it.

Cześć. Conrad Falk 23:15, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds OK--just do whatever you think is best for Wikipedia.Conrad Falk 02:09, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Strategy games

Hello Swwright.

WikiProject Strategy games has finished it's first collaboration: Risk (game) (). We are now asking for nominations and input for a new one. Please voice your ideas at the talk page.

Clyde (talk) and WikiProject Strategy games.

Hmmm, looks like you are using a 'bot of some sort, Clyde. Nevertheless, I will assume that you are watching my page, since you left a comment here; so I will reply here. If I don't hear anything from you within a few days, I will ~~copy my remarks to~~ stick a tickler in your user page. By the way, you have a really cool user-box setup. I would like to copy it. I am guessing that's OK, since everything here seems to be more-or-less community property.

I joined WikiProject Strategy Games when I found that a new article about Quantum Tic Tac Toe, was claimed by the Project. I had been planning to write such an article, but my interpretation of the conflict of interest policy forbade me to do so; fortunately, someone else created a stub to work from. I joined Strategy Games before I understood what the Project was about, and have not contributed so far. Perhaps I should absent myself from the Project.

My involvement with Wikipedia so far has consisted of preparing a draft of the QT3 article, copyediting where I saw something I could quickly fix, and adding a few references to some physic-related articles. And learning how to work with SVG, using the flimsy excuse that it is the preferred graphic format for Wikipedia. Amazing, the amount of time one can ~~waste~~ use up, learning how to make effective graphics with SVG.

— SWWright^Talk 00:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No I didn't use a bot to deliver these. All were done by hand. As to the watchlist, I removed many of the people on there as to not have a bloated watchlist. Wikiproject strategy games is really, by it's very nature, informal and autonomous. Whether or not you would like to leave is your choice (you are not the first), but know you are always welcome to come to our talk page or rejoin. If you do decide to stay, I'll shamelessly advertise for you to vote for our collaboration, or just do your own thing with QT3 and SVG.

The userbox setup I have was made by Master of Puppets, who is currently on break. You are welcome to copy it (I say so on my page) but I won't really be able to help you that much with formatting. If you do have a question, I'll do my best to help, but I would reccomend emailing MoP for more complicated issues.--Clyde (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Strategy games

Hello Swwright.

WikiProject Strategy games finished it's first collaboration on Risk (game). We have voted for possible candidates for the next collaboration, and three finalists have been selected:

If possible, please vote here on which of these articles to collaborate on. Thank you.

WikiProject Strategy games

Images listed for deletion

Some of your images or media files have been listed for deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion if you are interested in preserving them.

Thank you. — SWWright^Talk 23:59, 24 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Let's see ...

{{ifd}} template on each image page ... Check.
Images listed and reason given on the Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion page ... Check.
Notified myself that my images are going to be deleted ... Check.

I think I followed the procedure correctly, let's see what happens!

— SWWright^Talk 00:06, 25 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Much later -- everything worked just like it was supposed to. The images were deleted within an hour, actually. — SWWright^Talk 06:30, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:IllegalAlienAmericanEdition.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:IllegalAlienAmericanEdition.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 13:49, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So, I went and looked, and behold! the image I linked to, in my draft of the Illegal Alien article, had been replaced by a warning that I was making unfair use of an image. Seems that some other bot had noticed the image was linked to by a user page (my draft) (which is not kosher), not by an article (which IS kosher). Then BetaCommand's bot came along and noticed the image was no longer linked from any page (true, due to the previous bot).

Fixed the situation by finishing my draft (by fiat, I just declared it done) and copying the content to the brand-new Illegal Alien article, deleting the content from my draft page (gotta figure out how to get that page deleted, now), and removing the "yer gonna be deleted" template from the image.

— SWWright^Talk 06:29, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use disputed for Image:IllegalAlienAmericanEdition.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:IllegalAlienAmericanEdition.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:07, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw your comment at Betacommand's talk page - yeah, the rationale is way incomplete, please see WP:FURG for guidance and let me know if you have any questions. Regards - Videmus Omnia ^Talk 05:58, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I see you have been fielding a fair number of the complaints directed toward BetaCommand about his bot. I'm sure he appreciates the help, the amount of stuff on his talk page has quadrupled since I first looked there a week or so ago.

I am wading through some of the fair-use-rationale word-bloat, and it's not as bad as I thought at first glance. Somebody put together a good template to fill in, and there actually are some examples of how to do it. — SWWright^Talk 06:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Added fair use rationale to the cover image, let's see if BC's bot finds any more nits to pick. — SWWright^Talk 06:15, 16 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Four days, and BetaCommand's bot hasn't touched my stuff. Is the bot broken? Or did I finally manage to get it right? — SWWright^Talk 20:29, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Quantum tic tac toe

Hello. I have just been reading the QTTT talk page and I for one would absolutely love some informed editing. My only knowledge about it is the American Journal of Physics article by Allan Goff, which was very good, but there must be more information out there. Please please edit the page and let the world know about this wonderful game! Very best wishes, Robinh 07:17, 19 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again. Well I just noticed that I posted an almost identical message to you (at the top of your discussion page) about a year ago, which I completely forgot about. (There must be some braincell-related reason ;-). I couldn't find the draft you mentioned; could you point me towards it? I like the game itself from a game theory perspective, and from a learning-about-quantum-mechanics perspective. I am a statistician by profession, so QM is something I feel I ought to know about (uncertainty and all that). Best wishes, Robinh 07:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Robin, the draft is located at User:Swwright/CurrentWork. I have a a good beginning, especially the graphic (hand-coded SVG, converted to animated GIF) -- learning SVG took a while. I need to add more about the classical ensemble (or perhaps rewrite that section), make it all less wordy, etc. — SWWright^Talk 20:23, 20 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Periodic Acid Schiff Hello SSWright. Wikipedia flagged me down when I was heading to something else and brought your commments to my attention... once again I believe but, in reviewing your comments, a couple of questions came to mind as well as a comment. I assume that you read some kind of "watermark" from the electron microscopy site that told you that the formula reproduced in wikipedia was from their site. Is that so? If so, then are they claiming copyright on the formula or on the expression of the formula? If you wonder where the "original" expression of this formula was first published, it was in a monograph written by my father while he worked at Oxford and published there in 1946. Cheers —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.110.8.56 (talk) 03:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]