User talk:Swordfish121,641
November 2024
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Swordfish121,641 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
How can you say that I'm not here to build an encyclopedia? The only actual content I've edited was on the Prentis Cobb Hale page. On one of those edits, I capitalized "LL.B." On the other edit, I pointed out that Mr. Hale was admitted to the California Bar in 1936 (and I added a cite to the California Bar website showing this.) Your blocking me makes no sense. Swordfish121,641 (talk) 23:28, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You filter log explains it all. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 04:56, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Swordfish121,641 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
You say my "filter log explains it all." How so? I read my filter log, and all it says was that I attempted to edit user talk pages. You've edited other users' talk pages too, @Jpgordon:. So by your own standards, you should be blocked too. This is hypocrisy. In all of those edits I attempted to make, I attempted to ask other users to support my request for adminship. In the first two of those edits I made, here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Addshore&diff=prev&oldid=1258208645 and here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:0xDeadbeef&diff=prev&oldid=1258208651, my edits were published. But after I made the other edits, WP kept claiming my edits were "User talk page disruption." Is there some rule against asking other users to support my request for adminship? If there isn't a rule against this, you've blocked me improperly. If there is a rule against asking other users to support my request for adminship, I apologize and will not do this again. You should give me another chance, particularly since none of my content edits were deemed vandalism. Swordfish121,641 (talk) 12:59, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
As you see no problems here, there are no grounds for me to lift this block. Yamla (talk) 13:16, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Swordfish121,641 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Can you please explain to me exactly what I did that violated any of WP's policies, and why it violated WP's policies. I did not intentionally do anything wrong, and if anything I did in soliciting support for my adminship request was somehow bad, I promise not to do it again if you unblock me. Swordfish121,641 (talk) 18:17, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I suggest you spend your time being blocked to read some Wikipedia pages about being an admin to understand that your first edit should not have been to apply for the admin role, and spamming users' talk pages was disruptive. PhilKnight (talk) 19:50, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship#Nomination standards and Wikipedia:Canvassing#Inappropriate notification. Can you tell us if you have edited under any other account? If not, how did you come across the Request for Adminship page? ⇌ Jake Wartenberg 19:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Swordfish121,641 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Ok ok ok @PhilKnight: I read WP's rules for admin qualifications. I also read the rules that say spamming talk pages was disruptive. I admit is, I've learned my lesson, I was wrong, and won't do it again. Your statement, "I suggest you spend your time being blocked to read some Wikipedia pages" sounds like that this was only a temporary block, and that you're willing to give me another chance. So will you unblock me now? And @Jake Wartenberg: in answer to your question, I used to edit pages under the username User:Kyleandrew1. I think my last edit was in 2009, so it's been a long time. Swordfish121,641 (talk) 03:25, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have been indefinitely blocked. That means forever, unless you manage to successfully appeal, which could happen as early as today. But to be unblocked, you'll have to convince an administrator that you're here to build an encyclopedia, not to cause problems. Right now, you're not convincing anyone. I suggest reading WP:GAB and doing something else for a little while. Once you've had a break, come back and tell us what kinds of edits you want to make. -- asilvering (talk) 06:31, 20 November 2024 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.