User talk:Swivvlekmk

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Generation Yes (July 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Generation Yes.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 02:56, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC Generation Yes (Scotland) was accepted

Generation Yes (Scotland), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Coin945 (talk) 16:03, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Generation-Yes-Scottish-i-009.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Generation-Yes-Scottish-i-009.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 20:45, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

COIN Notice

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Vitalis196 (talk) 20:57, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This article was deleted due to vandalism and continuous false information being published. This was not the intended use of the page I created, so I requested that it be deleted. There is no evidence that the page was deleted due to political reasons, but rather for the reasons stated above and to stop the article becoming unreliable due to the erroneous and unsourced information being edited into it. Swivvlekmk (talk) 22:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Generation Yes (Scotland), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. The information you are deleting is sourced and does not appear to be vandalism. Please explain your concerns at the talk page. —C.Fred (talk) 22:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies, I did not intend to remove any templates and thought content had to be deleted in order to delete the page. I’m not familiar with the workings of Wikipedia so was unsure how to go about requesting the deletion. Thank you for letting me know that I did this the wrong way, I will keep this in mind should I be in a similar situation in the future.

The information in the history section, relating to the founders of the organisation lists false names, as well as fictional characters as the cofounders. The only cofounders were Kirsten Thornton and Graeme West, and the article used to back up the inclusion of Rhiannon Spear was false and challenged at the time of the article’s publication. The correction of the article is not available online as far as I can see. If the article cannot be kept free from editors including fictional characters in the list of founders then it would be best if the article about the now defunct organisation, was deleted. Swivvlekmk (talk) 22:11, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at [[:Generation Yes (Scotland)]], you may be blocked from editing. You have been (repeatedly) informed that your actions are disruptive. At this point they go beyond good-faith edits and constitute vandalism. Please stop now. --Vitalis196 (talk) 00:27, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I’m not sure where you get the idea that I’M the vandal? I’ve not been the one adding fictional names to the article Swivvlekmk (talk) 00:37, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since your account is six years old, I'm going to assume you're familiar with WP:No personal attacks. Please focus on constructive comments to improve the article. You will get far more traction for your position if you present reliable sources that show the extra names were not founders than if you continue to attack other editors. —C.Fred (talk) 01:55, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How can I prove someone doesn’t exist? Genuine question Swivvlekmk (talk) 02:05, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Swivvlekmk (talk) 02:49, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]