User talk:SwissArmyGuy

Welcome

Hello, SwissArmyGuy, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Directories and indexes Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse The Help Desk, for more advanced questions Help pages Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

January 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I declined your request to delete Draft:Christopher Paul Richards under CSD criteria G13 as the article was edited recently (last 7 days). Please do not nominate any articles for deletion (regardless of method) unless you fully understand the process and rationale. Thanks, N.J.A. | talk 14:08, 19 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of best-selling books Revert

I wanted you to know I reverted your edit to List of best-selling books because the article you cited claims Mein Kampf only sold 85000 copies in its current release - not the 12 million you claimed. Furthermore, the introduction of the article indicates "All books of a religious, ideological, philosophical or political nature have thus been excluded from the below lists of best-selling books for these reasons" (emphasis mine) so please do not attempt to redo your edit without a discussion on the article talk page.

Thank you.

--KNHaw ^(talk) 00:07, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (February 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SwissArmyGuy! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 17:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

List of parties to international copyright agreements

Please slow down and take the time to read and understand the edit summaries. in that context, "Geneva" and "Paris" are not city names; they are the names of the treaty "Acts" -- essentially versions -- named after the cities where they were concluded. TJRC (talk) 01:40, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources to show notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 11:25, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ulundandar Kovil (March 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NBUILDING, requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ulundandar Kovil and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ulundandar Kovil, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 00:28, 17 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. creffett (talk) 14:16, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indefinite block

Sorry, but even the potential harassment of minors is something we take very seriously on Wikipedia. You said while he's inactive on YouTube and Instagram. When I ask him to follow on Instagram, specifically do not. I'm so sorry about my incident while ago. Frankly, that is too incoherent for me to parse. Until you are able to provide a sufficient, cogent explanation, this block will remain in effect (unless, of course, the Arbitration Committee or Trust and Safety figure it out first, in which case, I defer to their discretion). El_C 16:13, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to apologize why do i harass User:Kingerikthesecond have been emailed for asking social media accounts. It is my incident while ago, I've been emailed for several times for i've asking when he has Discord, YouTube, or Instagram. If it is very possible to assume good faith when I just made my mistake, just messing around, making potential harassment of people's emails, and it would violates WMF's Terms of Use. Also, I didn't vandalize articles or pages on Wikipedia. But it is very hard to explain why if I am blocked until when I provide cogent and coherent answers to a number of questions on Wikipedia, so I have to contact to Arbitration Committee. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 22:08, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This is not a convincing appeal; it does not properly explain the motivation behind the behavior that led to the block, and I'm afraid that a proper, honest explanation might require keeping up the block as well. I have forwarded the matter to the legal-reports address just in case your attempt to reach them was unsuccessful or made up. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:46, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Specifically, I don't made WP:BLACKMAIL to someone, because I would help while I've supposed for being apologized. --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 22:35, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

A suggestion

Since you do not seem to be capable of writing fluently and coherently in the English language, perhaps it would be better if you tried contributing to Wikipedia in whatever language you speak best. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 22:40, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apology

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Here's the reason that would explain: First, I've been emailed to this user "Kingerikthesecond" for suggesting coronavirus articles, (but, he only fixed minor edits for all time), Second, i've ask for social media accounts, (but unfortunately, he only used Discord), Third, he also asked who follow me on Instagram, so didn't get it. But meanwhile, his bio userpage reads, "Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks." to make sure keeping safe from personal attacks, bullying, or harassment, that was a series to protect minors (see Wikipedia:Guidance for younger editors#Your safety and security). And then when it appears might be an incident while I'm emailing to the Administrators' board while I'm apologizing to "Kingerikthesecond" last night, soon it would be declined and blocked indefinitely. But, I only speak English, I'm very sorry, and I promise not to harm anyone, also thank you for consideration. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 01:12, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your e-mails to another editor were unacceptable, and your explanations for sending them are not understandable. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:31, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Here’s my evidence that I made myself:
# First, I emailed to “Kingerikthesecond” for the first time with this message, “Hello, would you to suggest to review about the 2020 coronavirus outbreak in Norway?” # “Kingerikthesecond” received his first message, explaining “I am not trained in medicine and diseases and such so I have little information about the topic” and he only fixed minor grammar/spelling. # Second, I’ve emailed to “Kingerikthesecond” for asking when he had social media would asked, # Then, he received an email, that he only used Discord account. While he is inactive on social media, (because Wikipedia is not a social media site), He tricked, and then I accidentally followed him on Instagram. It was my mistake, I just messing up, but it doesn't get right. But need to do, is to stop.
#Then later on, “Kingerikthesecond” posted this message on Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents page while he'd posted my evidence on Imgur. #Later, I've explained why if I blackmailed “Kingerikthesecond”? because it is my fault. Because I spoke English, then I could have a reason to reconsider the problem what I've contacted to the Arbitration Committee, Trust and Safety, and reporting illegal content concerning minors to the Wikimedia Foundation. Also, I've followed these rules on Wikipedia, and I'm sorry. But if I violated policies regarding WP:OUTING and WP:BLACKMAIL (especially for minors), I will promise would never doing it ever again. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 05:19, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As you've already been told, we need a satisfactory explanation for your sending the emails before we can consider unblocking. I appreciate that English doesn't appear to be your first language, but this unblock request is incomprehensible. As it reads, you're claiming that you accidentally tracked another editor down on Instagram and followed them, which isn't remotely credible. ‑ Iridescent 06:56, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

SwissArmyGuy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The only reason why I've been accidentally emailed to User:Kingerikthesecond for stalking his Instagram account. It is my fault when I'm blackmailed to this user asking for social media, then it would violates WP:OUTING. SwissArmyGuy (talk) 07:47, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but the dialogue below is almost totally incomprehensible, and it means I really can not accept this unblock request. If you can not speak English, you can not work on the English language Wikipedia, it is as simple as that. Please, voluntarily withdraw and work on a Wikipedia in a language you can speak instead (and perhaps try again here some time in the future if your English improves). If you continue with these incomprehensible attempts at discussion here, someone is likely to remove your ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

SwissArmyGuy, this is just a suggestion but you may want to post an explanation in whatever your native language is, since it's obvious both from your posts and from your article edits (e.g. [1], [2], [3]) that your English is limited and it seems you're having a lot of difficulty trying to explain in English what happened. As Cullen328 says above, you may also want to consider contributing to the Wikipedia in your own language instead of here, since if you keep trying to contribute here without speaking the language, you're likely to continue getting into difficulties. ‑ Iridescent 08:06, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SwissArmyGuy, I have removed the userbox from your user page claiming that you are a native speaker of the English language, as you clearly have difficulty even making yourself understood in English. Those userboxes are for us to help each other with communication, and making false claims about language ability is misleading. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 08:37, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:Boing! said Zebedee, no wonder what I did to translate some English articles, but sometimes even multilingual articles. --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 08:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Being multilingual and being fluent (I suspect you mean fluent rather than native) are not the same thing.Slatersteven (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But I briefly translated some foreign articles, including sources from German Wikipedia among with this article SS America (1939), ([4]). --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 09:50, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is the sum total of your edits to SS America (1939); all you did was remove a gallery, mess about with the image placement, and add a single incomprehensible and apparently machine-translated sentence to the text. Again, we're not trying to be nasty, but this is an English-language project and if you can't speak English, you really shouldn't be editing here. ‑ Iridescent 09:57, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

But also I forgot something, even I cited these sources about the auction of King Tut's bust, ([5] and [6]) and citing copyright information for Disney film Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs. ([7]) --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 10:15, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Including I removed this gallery from the SS America (1939), to omit this space, but it is only available at Wikimedia Commons gallery page. --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 10:05, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lastly, I've been removed and changed some external links to SS America (1939). --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 10:14, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

At this stage AGF flies out of the window on a pig. Are you just using goggle translate, because the problem is not the words its the syntax. I think this has gone way beyond not being nasty, your English really is of the "all your bases are belong to us" variety. Please stop wasting our time now.Slatersteven (talk) 10:20, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I am sure with AGF, and using Google Translate, but I'm very serious with both. --SwissArmyGuy (talk) 10:22, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This my my last comment here, the above is nonsense (and as such renders any attempt as meaningful reply pointless). I am going to suggest you stop posting nonsense, go away and actually learn the language, before the ability to post here is taken away.Slatersteven (talk) 10:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

You are clearly unable to communicate in English in a manner that is comprehensible. You have been wasting everyone's time here — no one can understand you. As a result, your talk page access has been revoked. El_C 10:53, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You did not need to email me about your intention to appeal via UTRS. But since you did, a word of caution: if you continue to to waste the time of volunteers there, too, you are likely to see the same result in that avenue, as well. El_C 11:08, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Since inappropriate emails have been the reason for the block in the first place, and even talk page access had to be revoked due to persistent disruption, I have revoked email access as well. To my knowledge, there has not yet been new abuse of the email feature; this is a preemptive measure. The block should prevent the user from ever continuing what they did; a block with email access enabled does not serve this purpose. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:01, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That makes sense. Thanks, ToBeFree. El_C 13:09, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-wiki block circumvention will not be tolerated

meta:Special:PermanentLink/19974188#Help_me ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My gasp has never been so flabbred.Slatersteven (talk)

SwissArmyGuy, you have exahusted our collective patience. El_C 14:11, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susie Hargreaves has been accepted

Susie Hargreaves, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

MurielMary (talk) 03:36, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom block

You have been indefinitely blocked by the Arbitration Committee.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, then appeal by emailing the Arbitration Committee (direct address: arbcom-enwikimedia.org).

Administrators: This block may not be modified or lifted without the express prior written consent of the Arbitration Committee. Questions about this block should be directed to the Committee's mailing list.

For the Arbitration Committee –xeno^talk 18:55, 15 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. The Hydrophilian (talk) 01:49, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Hermann Zapf in 1960.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. The Hydrophilian (talk) 22:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth

Hello, SwissArmyGuy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Campaign for the Fair Sentencing of Youth".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 09:33, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Da Vinci Kids logo.svg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Da Vinci Kids logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:16, 27 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Britten signature.jpg

The file File:Britten signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Britten signature (vect).svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 05:02, 28 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Alfred Hitchcock signature.jpeg

The file File:Alfred Hitchcock signature.jpeg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, redundant to File:Alfred Hitchcock Signature.svg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:22, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Hermann Zapf signature.jpg

The file File:Hermann Zapf signature.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, superseded by File:Hermann_Zapf._Signatur_1958.jpg.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 15:55, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]