User talk:Swism

Laurel Kenner

Hi, You need to rewrite it in your own words - it still reads like a copy from the same source. Good luck with the rewrite. Dlyons493 Talk

Vic Nieder

Starting to agree that Dlyons is taking shots at the VN piece and related articles. I re wrote it this morning, and I think it is representative of the work other writers have put in, and a fair piece on him. I do not believe Dlyons took down the Crabel piece, but I can not find record of who did or for what reason (I am fairly new here). I'll try to put up a Crabel piece shortly. Daviegold 10:02, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I just made some changes to the Niederhoffer piece, and think it is now in good shape. Spoke to Dlyons, I think he is ok, just takes his editing very seriously. I think usually its easier to change/improve articles if people complain about them, unless its overt vandalism, as it wastes time for both sides to get into a revert war. Daviegold 12:59, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Answer

My employer encourages it, actually. And I get more work done than anyone else in the office. Thanks for asking. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 05:25, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Roy Niederhoffer

A tag has been placed on Roy Niederhoffer requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ironholds (talk) 14:21, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Roy Niederhoffer

The article Roy Niederhoffer has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable per WP:BIO#Creative professionals.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Evil saltine (talk) 15:50, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Laurel Kenner for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laurel Kenner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laurel Kenner until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 07:37, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]