User talk:Swisher1

Welcome...

Hello, Swisher1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Rivertorch (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thought I'd give you an official welcome template since you haven't had one yet. Thanks for helping to fix South Buffalo! Rivertorch (talk) 08:40, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2016

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Henry J. Mansell with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:42, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Edward Kmiec with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:43, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2019

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. DynaGirl (talk) 22:02, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hi there. My apologies for our disagreement regarding Nathan Phillips; I get your position, but I think it not quite right for the article at this point. I did want to give you a (hopefully friendly) warning--I am not going to boards or anything, but when you bring up the possibility of legal action, you risk running afoul of WP:NLT. So keep advocating for your position, but just keep that in mind. Cheers! Dumuzid (talk) 22:58, 22 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]