User talk:Swinquest/Archives/2009/January

Speedy deletion of FNBO Direct

A tag has been placed on FNBO Direct, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. ukexpat (talk) 04:41, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of FNBO Direct

I have nominated FNBO Direct, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FNBO Direct. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:26, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

McDoof deletion

Hi Sweet-pea. I've just come across the discussion on the McDonald's talk page about deleting "McDoof", and I don't understand why it's been deleted. I'm from the UK where the term isn't used, so it probably the case that I'm just unaware of something relevant, but could you explain the reasoning behind the deletion? Many thanks Dom Kaos (talk) 01:08, 16 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, your explanation makes perfect sense. Regards  :) Dom Kaos (talk) 12:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:FNBO Direct logo.JPG)

Thanks for uploading File:FNBO Direct logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:04, 16 January 2009 (UTC)