User talk:Swiksek

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Goddessy2007Book.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Goddessy2007Book.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:2008CalendarFrontCover(sm).jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:2008CalendarFrontCover(sm).jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. NotifyBot (talk) 15:26, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

Stephanie Adams the teacher

Here is the most recent example of your curious objection to addition of something about Adams, who seems to be of great concern to you.

It seems to me that this is much better sourced than are various other claims in the article, e.g. that Adams became "an avid financial investor in Fortune 500 companies". The most prominent source for the article is The New York Post; there's also something called "Photorazzi".

What's the problem? -- Hoary (talk) 16:46, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Caution

Mass removals, please don't do that. Regards, NonvocalScream (talk) 23:56, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Don't tell me what to do. I am doing exactly what you did to one article and making it consistent on Wikipedia. I will encourage others to do the same or complain about your frivolous editing to Wikipedia. If you feel the need to remove basic facts about one playmate, then maybe you should do the same for every other playmate, since you're the one who feels that the exact same sources about Stephanie Adams can be removed, yet not removed about any other playmates. I will send an e-mail to Wiki about this as well. Swiksek (talk) 00:06, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

You have just engaged in a violation of our policy against disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point.

Perhaps you were not aware of this policy previously, however, as NonvocalScream and I are pointing out, this policy does exist, and violations of it are taken as seriously as other policy issues such as vandalism and harrassing other users.

I would like to request and invite you to roll back your recent changes for the meantime, in a gesture of good faith and cooperation with the policy you violated. If you want to discuss the policy and content issues raised by having or not having those statistics, please do so on article talk pages for the time being.

Thank you. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 00:10, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

It's not a violation of WP:POINT if the editor is acting in the best interests of the encyclopedia, which I believe that this user was doing (attempting to maintain consistency among articles of the same nature). I don't agree with the edit summaries that were being used, but I could make a pretty easy argument that the edits were based in "good faith." --InDeBiz1 (talk) 03:15, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Just noting: WP:POINT is not a policy, just a guideline. No comment on the issue at hand, just saying... Majorly (talk) 00:21, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Slow Down  :)

Just haven't gotten to that one yet.  :) --InDeBiz1 (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2008 (UTC)