User talk:Swiftink

Welcome!

Hello, Swiftink, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --A Nobody^{My talk} 17:21, 22 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very, very much, A Nobody! It was very nice of you to find me these articles. Thanks also for your help; I'm a newbie and just finding my way around here. :) Sincerely,Swiftink (talk) 00:39, 23 November 2008 (UTC)Swiftink[reply]

Hey

Left ya a response on Talim's talk page, pretty much saying go ahead and work the details in there for 3 and 4 while I can follow up with the events of 2, just keep it minimalistic. Other than that keep an eye out for any sources we can use for reception, hers is probably the lightest of all the articles atm.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 17:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

January 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Firestar (disambiguation), did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 03:07, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hola

Hi again- thx for the cookie! And I'd love to put in userboxes, but I've got no idea how to make them. Help! :)

Also, and u don't have to answer this since it's kinda personal, but r u a girl? ;)

~~Moonwhisker123~~

March 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Firestar's Quest. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You removed a large part of the article that makes it Good Article material. Gears of War 2 02:49, 10 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: welcome

Thank you -LittleBigPlanet^Hello! 01:42, 13 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome. :) Swiftink (talk) 15:42, 15 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Swiftink. You have new messages at Next-Genn-Gamer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

N.G.G. 21:51, 18 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Emailing

Yeah, I looked for the email thing, but, being a slight airhead, I don't see it. I looked to the VERY left- u mean under the Wikipedia planet thingy, or on your actual userpage? Cuz I can't see anything. :)

Moonwhisker123

--74.215.213.21 (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talim/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mines32

I did a little digging in the history and it seems there is a connection with the IP's and a user named Mines32 (User:Mines32)). Mines32 and the IP's are making the same exact edits to the article looking between 2 diffs. One on December 2, 2008 and on April 12, 2009. I think the user account should be questioned about this. Also, please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Mines32, I made a case to see if the IP's match this user. Momusufan (talk) 01:51, 12 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soul series task force?

Would such a thing interest you? I proposed it on the video game project's talk page, but it seems to have fallen on deaf ears as it were.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 05:02, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi!

Hi! I'm a member of wikiproject warriors... Do you have any idea where the other members of wikiproject warriors went? Most of them apparently haven't contributed since 2008. So it almost seems as if the entire project has... stopped. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brambleclawx (talk • contribs) 14:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC) sorry, i forgot to sign. Brambleclawx (talk) 15:56, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Roll call for WikiProject Warriors

Hello. You have listed youself as an active contributor of WikiProject Warriors, but as we are trying to see who is still active, we have put all active contributors under "status pending." If you are still active, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Warriors and move your name to "Active." Move your name to "Inactive" if you no longer wish to contribute. You may always move it back. On December 27, 2009, all members who have not listed themselves as active will be moved to the "inactive" section. Thank you!

Airplaneman ^talk 03:37, 27 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Warriors

You know that we have moved your name to the inactive list, right? Bramble claw x 01:40, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Darn...I'll go change it back. I'm still making minor edits to Warriors articles, actually. Thanks for the notice. Swiftink (talk) 02:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've done it for you. See you around! Bramble claw x 21:48, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you; that was very thoughtful! --Swiftink (talk) 22:59, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; I love to do everything I can to keep the project as active as possible. Bramble claw x 01:24, 23 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion?

Do you feel that a list of Clan terms (ie leafbare, thunderpath, etc.) is necessary on the Warriors (novel series) page? Bramble claw x 01:55, 5 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I don't believe that's necessary. To be perfectly honest, I don't think that we even need to have so many of the minor characters displayed on individual pages. That's too in-universe. I'd personally like to focus more on critical review and reception, notability-wise, on each book, as well as critical acclamation of the series itself, instead of worrying about all the unnecessary in-universe stuff. I believe one called it 'fancruft' or something of the sort. Lately, on the Warriors project, people have veered away from making sure it's clear why it's notable to in-universe things like characters. Please give me feedback on this; I know I'm not around a lot on Wiki...I might actually have to become inactive, due to everything that's going on, but I want to see where you want to go with this. --Swiftink (talk) 18:09, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, well, I've consulted with other members of the project, and we all agreed that it's too in-universe (WP:FANCRUFT). I understand the need for critical reception sections; I personally believe that a large majority of the book articles would probably be deleted if taken to AfD (which I hope does not happen). The main problem seems to be the difficulty of finding reviews. Do you know where, speicifically, book reviews can be found? If so, drop me a note. And don't worry, I've got your talkpage watchlisted, so when you make a comment, I will check back ASAP. Bramble claw x 22:52, 23 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Warriors role call

Hello Swiftink. You have listed yourself as an active contributor of WikiProject Warriors, but as we are trying to see who is still active, we have put all active contributors under "status pending." If you are still active, go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Warriors and move your name to "Active." Move your name to "Inactive" if you no longer wish to contribute. You may always move it back. On December 27, 2024, all members who have not listed themselves as active will be moved to the "inactive" section. Thank you!

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Warriors at 05:43, 27 November 2010 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]