User talk:Swiftie1313
May 2020
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Thank U, Next. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
Your recent editing history at Thank U, Next shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Kleuske (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
but that information is unnecessary. what's the point adding things about billie, taylor and lady gaga on a wikipedia page about ariana grande's album? that information already there on their respective wikipedia page..i've already said that information is required here Swiftie1313 (talk) 10:43, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
1. You don't own Wikipedia. Don't make your own rules. 2. It is NECESSARY because it is MENTIONED in the article. it wouldn't be necessary otherwise. It is RELEVANT to let know the readers why Grande is 3rd/4th, and who is she behind. It is a VERY usual and common thing followed in EVERY Wikipedia article. 3. You're new here. So I suggest you read the guidelines before editing and engaging in edit wars. Don't get yourself disabled. BawinV (talk) 23:33, 16 May 2020 (UTC)
- (Came here from the Thank U, Next article) BawinV, refrain from shouting at and biting new editors. It seems like you're the one who needs to read guidelines. And the content in question is not exactly common practice to include, as featured articles like Love. Angel. Music. Baby., Good Girl Gone Bad and 4 (Beyoncé album) do not include any such thing. It is hardly something done in "EVERY" article. Start discussing your additions on the talk page when they are removed, not after reverting the removal (WP:BRD). However, I would advise Swiftie1313 to use edit summaries next time.--NØ 15:54, 17 May 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Dangerous Woman, you may be blocked from editing. Cool Marc ✉ 11:20, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
Billboard Digital Sales Charts
[edit]Hello,
Can you STOP adding the Billboard Digital Singles/Sales/Songs chart to articles. When a song has charted on the Billboard Hot 100, we do not add these charts as they're component charts. This is detailed at WP:USCHARTS where it is fully explained. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
- Anywhere where you have already done this, please remove them. ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:46, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
okk..sorry! Swiftie1313 (talk) 22:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
Roohi Negative Reviews
[edit]I have studied the material around the film and Roohi has gotten mixed responses. Spotboye is one of the biggest bollywood portal in India. Also, you have quoted Taran Adarsh's tweet then why is India Today article which is a compilation of tweets invalid? Do not tell me India Today is an unverified source now, please! Also, why are you so biased towards showing the film reception in negative light? Film has done 5 Crore box office business in 2 days, it has gotten mixed reviews from different entities but you are quite keen on highlighting the negative reviews. Are you getting paid to do that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geetwrd (talk • contribs) 09:55, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. 157.46.70.1 (talk) 16:27, 15 September 2021 (UTC)
Blocked for sockpuppetry
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. GeneralNotability (talk) 23:51, 15 September 2021 (UTC)