User talk:Swibe

Thanks

Thanks for the comment and Cup of Tea. Woodlot (talk) 17:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sychao: Revision history

Don't get me wrong, we're all guilty of this in varying capacities, but there was a minute between article creation and nomination. Maybe do some looking through the backlog before getting to the front of the queue?

I'm going to post pretty much the same thing to the admin, but I think the users would appreciate it - especially newbies. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 20:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have absolutely no recollection of what the article "Sychao" was, as it was a little while ago - in addition, there is no information about it via search engine, so you may have to refresh my memory. Also, I saw no CSD contest from the original editor.

I may have acted too hastily, for which I apologize, but depending on the content of the article (once again, I apologize for forgetting), I may stand by my current position, as I tend to nominate articles that do not display potential for improving, based on their subject matter. Swibe (talk) 22:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looking through your deleted edits, it's clear that you know how to spot a problem (the hasty tagging of Minecraft server articles is a favourite) - but a minute isn't enough time to know whether a one-sentence article is going to improve (mostly...) - especially if a newbie wrote it. You're very good at what you do, it's just about doing it too quickly! Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 12:42, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments, it means a lot! I'm still relatively new to editing Wikipedia, so I'm grateful for feedback like this. Swibe (talk) 13:38, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mines

Hello Swibe the reponse is very simple i'm a mining passionate and i research a lot! :) Cheers and happy editing. BineMai 03:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Here you go! Thanks for the kind message and review :) Yakikaki (talk) 08:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BLP sources message

Dear Swibe, some additional citations have been added into the page of Samuel_So:
1. Samuel So at the Hong Kong Movie DataBase
2. Samuel So is the current members of Hong Kong Screenwriters' Guild
Please let me know if you have further concerns, Many thanks! ^.^"
--Samuel So (talk) 08:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent! That's all that's needed. Keep on doing what you're doing. Swibe (talk) 08:57, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

re: Question regarding notability

Hi. Basically, Test cricket is the highest level of the sport, and as per the consensus of the Cricket Project, any player or umpire appearing in a Test match is deemed notable ("The major cricket qualification includes any player or umpire who has appeared in a Test match since 1877"). 1877 being the year the first Test match was played. If you don't agree with this, then I'd recommend you raise it on the talkpage of the Cricket Project. Also as you've admitted to "ignorance of the sport of cricket", then I suggest you probably shouldn't use an automated tool to slap tags on articles you know little about. Lugnuts ^{Dick Laurent is dead} 18:02, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Regardless of my knowledge of cricket, I am still unsure of the precise justification for individual articles about various umpires. As the information about said umpires is sparse due to their utter absence of notability, I would perhaps recommend merging them together into a larger list, or merely leaving their names as the values for "umpire" in, say, an infobox on their corresponding test matches (thank you for briefly explaining it, by the way!) if they exist, for examples. If they do not exist, that would further raise questions as to whether or not they truly merit articles.

I hope I did not come off as flippant, I'm simply baffled as to why anyone would decide upon this criteria. Swibe (talk) 18:13, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Edit: I didn't realize there was already a list-form article, I apologize. However, my suggestion is still to remove the articles on umpires with no other notable information. Could you possibly give me a reason as to why that is or is not a good idea?

Arisart

Nikki Ellina is a special noteable artist in her first steps and I think it's important for people to know about her. Thank you. Arisart

This may very well be true, but your article on a living person listed zero references (sorry, but Youtube is not a reliable source!), and references are necessary to verify notability.

If you remember to keep this in mind in future edits you should be just fine. Swibe (talk) 18:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

I created the page but did not review it. I can delete it for you. Hyacinth (talk) 23:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry about it, it's alright now. Thanks for notifying me about it, though. Swibe (talk) 00:03, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Serum Chronicles

The article is about a film and films cannot be speedy deleted. It isn't about a person. SL93 (talk) 02:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]