User talk:Sweetness46

Welcome

Hello, Sweetness46, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 07:16, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tim Allen

Please be careful when reverting vandalism. Abuse of the rollbacking tool can have serious consequences.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 23:31, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry too. I missed your undo. Keep up the good work.--The Legendary Sky Attacker 23:34, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Careless reverting

Please be more careful when reverting. Your revert of John William Finn was almost amusing, but definitely incorrect. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 19:09, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting in article Sarah Bernhardt

Give reasons for why my edit in this article was "constructive", don't only make idiotic brain farts. If an answer doesn't come within this hour, I consider your reverting as unfounded and then that is vandalism. --91.152.133.200 (talk) 20:07, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your rollback request

Hello Sweetness46, I have granted your account rollback in accordance with your request. Please remember that rollback is for reverting vandalism/spam, and that misuse of the tool, either by revert-warring with other users, or simply reverting edits you disagree with, can lead to it being removed. For practice, you may wish to see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback.

In addition, I noticed that you made some incorrect reverts, which did make me pause when reviewing your request, but you seem to recognize mistakes and are willing to correct them. Good luck. Acalamari 20:17, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Attack?

You accused me for "attack the other editors". Whom do I attacked? The fact, that most russians do not speak Kyrgyz language (as far as any other languages of the ethnic minorities onthe former Russian/Soviet Empire) is not attack, just fact. It is the same kind of facts, like most white Americans do not speak aboriginal amerindian languges. Most white Australians do not speak aboriginal languages. Often, when somebody tells, that white people do not speak aboriginal languages, whites blame him for "an attack". But white people themselve say "we do NOT speak, and we do NOT WANT to learn/speak yor/their f*cking pig language!" That's just the facts. Racism exists. Either you like the facts, or not, the facts just remain be the facts.

Sorry for disturbing your calm. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.218.18.46 (talk) 09:19, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

V-22 Osprey

Hello Sweetness46. First, let me apologize for not being logged in when I edited the V-22 Osprey article. That was me. Second, I would like to know the reason for the revert. By my reading of the rules, my addition to the Popular Culture section complies. It is cited, the Osprey is a major element of the plot (not just a sighting) of the story, and it is not part of a video game or an anime program. As per the rules stated in the Osprey page, I will also include this post in the talk page of the Osprey. Thanks. Fordsfords (talk) 17:01, 22 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. We all have a natural distrust of IP-based edits and hold them to a higher standard. Not necessarily "right" in the most abstract sense, but gets the job done most of the time. Fordsfords (talk) 15:37, 28 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the Article Rescue Squad!

Articles tagged for deletion and rescue
Category Articles tagged for deletion and rescue not found

Hi, Sweetness46, welcome to the Article Rescue Squadron! We are a growing community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to identifying and rescuing articles that have been tagged for deletion. Every day hundreds of articles are deleted, many rightfully so. But many concern notable subjects and are poorly written, ergo fixable and should not be deleted. We try to help these articles quickly improve and address the concerns of why they are proposed for deletion. This covers a lot of ground and your help is appreciated!

If you have any questions, feel free to ask on the talk page, and we will be happy to help you.

And once again - Welcome! -- Banjeboi 10:56, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reckless Reverts

Having perused your contribution history, I would suggest that you pay more attention to what you revert as Vandalism. Just because Huggle says it may be, doesn't mean that it is. If your going to revert something, read what your doing. It can also bee seen that other users have raised this issue with you. Please bear this in mind in future.--OffiMcSpin (talk) 17:26, 25 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

In Response to your enquiry, I was referring to this revert. 19:07, 20 June 2009 Sweetness46 (talk | contribs) m (19,004 bytes) (Reverted edits by OffiMcSpin to last version by Dom Kaos) (undo) -- OffiMcSpin (talk) 07:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Whilst you may feel aggrieved by connotations you attach to the word reckless, its meaning is of rashness, to approach a situation without properly establishing the available facts. It was meant not as a scolding as you attest, but as an earnest comment that you had done something which you appear to have done on at least 4 other occasions. It's was meant as an effort to encourage you to read up on an article before reverting it, as I feel it could be beneficial to you. No offence was intended, but the sentiment is valid.--OffiMcSpin (talk) 21:34, 26 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter (September 2009)

Lockheed Martin

You've been around long enough to know that when making changes to cited info, you need to add a new reference for your change. I've thus reverted your change to the Lockheed Martin article, and I've also made the date clear, and updated from a 2007 to a 2008 reference. - BilCat (talk) 03:40, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reversion

Why are you reverting legitimate edits? Not all IP users are vandals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.167.61.79 (talk) 03:17, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Sweetness46, I wanted you to know that I received this note on my talk page. While I'm not here to remove your rollback rights, I do note that you were given a post above advising you about rollback and Huggle use. While I have no comment on your recent reverts, I'd just like to kindly remind you to be careful, and that if you think something may not be vandalism, then don't revert it with an automated tool, and instead, revert it with a manual edit summary. Best. Acalamari 18:39, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter

	The Article Rescue Squadron Newsletter
	Issue 2 (January 2010) Previous issue \| Next issue

Content

The community is currently

deciding whether

60,000

articles should be deleted.

background

Membership of the Counter-Vandalism Unit

As you may know, the Counter-Vandalism unit is inactive. So for reviving the WikiProject, we will need to sort out the members. So if you are active, please put your username at the bottom of the list at Wikipedia talk:Counter-Vandalism Unit#Sort out the members.

You are receiving this message as a current member of the CVU.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of Counter-Vandalism Unit at 00:54, 30 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]